Parametric cost model for ground and space telescopes

H. Philip Stahl; Michael Allison

doi:10.1117/12.2562884

13 December 2020 Parametric cost model for ground and space telescopes

H. Philip Stahl, Michael Allison

Proceedings Volume 11450, Modeling, Systems Engineering, and Project Management for Astronomy IX; 114500Z (2020) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2562884
Event: SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, 2020, Online Only

Abstract

Parametric cost models can be used by designers and project managers to compare cost between major architectural cost drivers and allow high-level design trades; enable cost-benefit analysis for technology development investment; and, provide a basis for estimating total project cost between related concepts. The NASA Marshall Space Flight Center has developed a 5-parameter first-article optical telescope assembly cost model OTA$ (FY17) = $20M x 30 ^(S/G) x D ^(1.7) x λ (-0.5) x T ^(-0.25) x e ^{(-0.028) (Y-1960)} Where S/G = 1 for space and 0 for ground telescopes, D = diameter, λ = diffraction limited wavelength, T = operating temperature and Y = year of development. The model explains 92% (Adjusted R2) of the cost variation in a database of 47 total ground and space telescope assemblies (OTA). The MSFC model estimates the most likely cost for only the OTA. Where an OTA is defined as the subsystem which collects electromagnetic radiation and focuses it (focal) or concentrates it (afocal) into the science instruments. An OTA consists of the primary mirror, secondary mirror, auxiliary optics and support structure (such as optical bench or truss structure, primary support structure, secondary support structure or spiders, straylight baffles, mechanisms for adjusting the optical components, electronics or power systems for operating these mechanisms, etc.). Finally, duplication only reduces cost for the manufacture of identical systems (i.e. multiple aperture sparse arrays or interferometers). And, while duplication does reduce the cost of manufacturing the mirrors of segmented primary mirror, this cost savings does not appear to manifest itself in the final primary mirror assembly (presumably because the structure for a segmented mirror is more complicated than for a monolithic mirror).

Conference Presentation

Citation Download Citation

H. Philip Stahl and Michael Allison "Parametric cost model for ground and space telescopes", Proc. SPIE 11450, Modeling, Systems Engineering, and Project Management for Astronomy IX, 114500Z (13 December 2020); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2562884

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available