Paper
17 February 1995 Throughput/cost trade-off in passive optical networks: a comparison between shufflenets and multilevel optical networks (MONETs)
Andrea Borella, Franco Chiaraluce, Fabrizio Meschini
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 2450, Broadband Networks: Strategies and Technologies; (1995) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.201272
Event: Advanced Networks and Services, 1995, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Abstract
Shufflenet and MONET are compared in order to find the best solutions as regards the traffic management performance. Using simple mathematics, throughput and efficiency of both networks are derived and numerically evaluated under the constraint of a limited number of overall channels. It is shown that when the number of users is small shufflenet exhibits the best behavior, but MONETs only are able to connect a large number of users with satisfactory performance. Furthermore, the latter become more and more efficient when the hypothesis of uniform traffic is removed.
© (1995) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Andrea Borella, Franco Chiaraluce, and Fabrizio Meschini "Throughput/cost trade-off in passive optical networks: a comparison between shufflenets and multilevel optical networks (MONETs)", Proc. SPIE 2450, Broadband Networks: Strategies and Technologies, (17 February 1995); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.201272
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Wavelength division multiplexing

Optical networks

Tin

Passive optical networks

Data communications

Mathematics

Network architectures

Back to Top