Paper
12 September 2006 To split or not to split: case studies on Monte Carlo analysis of illumination ray tracing concerning the usefulness of ray-splitting
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
In Monte Carlo ray tracing, the efficacy of variance reduction techniques is often the subject of debate. One portion of the debate regards the use of ray-splitting in illumination analysis. While analysis results should be the same whether raysplitting or no ray-splitting is used, one approach might result in better precision for a given calculation time. Additionally, inexperienced illumination designers may perform analyses in such a way as to exacerbate the difference in precision between the two methods. This results in a very important decision for illumination designers: using ray-splitting or not can affect results and the time spent getting them. For this paper, common illumination applications are analyzed by ray tracing in TracePro1 (a non-sequential Monte Carlo ray tracing program) and the analysis results are compared. Both raysplitting and no ray-splitting methods are used to see if the analyses converge to the same results for simple setup conditions. The results will illustrate the factors to consider of before choosing to use ray-splitting or not, and show examples when one method may be better than another.
© (2006) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Patrick Le Houillier and Edward Freniere "To split or not to split: case studies on Monte Carlo analysis of illumination ray tracing concerning the usefulness of ray-splitting", Proc. SPIE 6338, Nonimaging Optics and Efficient Illumination Systems III, 633803 (12 September 2006); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.680883
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Ray tracing

Monte Carlo methods

RGB color model

Light scattering

Sensors

Scattering

LCDs

Back to Top