Target acquisition performance: effects of target aspect angle, dynamic imaging, and signal processing

Jaap A. Beintema; Piet Bijl; Maarten A. Hogervorst; Judith Dijk

doi:10.1117/12.777561

11 April 2008 Target acquisition performance: effects of target aspect angle, dynamic imaging, and signal processing

Jaap A. Beintema, Piet Bijl, Maarten A. Hogervorst, Judith Dijk

Proceedings Volume 6941, Infrared Imaging Systems: Design, Analysis, Modeling, and Testing XIX; 69410C (2008) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.777561
Event: SPIE Defense and Security Symposium, 2008, Orlando, Florida, United States

Abstract

In an extensive Target Acquisition (TA) performance study, we recorded static and dynamic imagery of a set of military and civilian two-handheld objects at a range of distances and aspect angles with an under-sampled uncooled thermal imager. Next, we applied signal processing techniques including DSR (Dynamic Super Resolution) and LACE (Local Adaptive Contrast Enhancement) to the imagery. In a perception experiment, we determined identification (ID) and threat/non-threat discrimination performance as a function of target range for a variety of conditions. The experiment was performed to validate and extend current TA models. In addition, range predictions were performed with two TA models: the TOD model and NVThermIP. The results of the study are: i) target orientation has a strong effect on performance, ii) the effect of target orientation is well predicted by the two TA models, iii) absolute identification range is close the range predicted with the two models using the recommended criteria for two-handheld objects, iv) there was no positive effect of sensor motion on performance, and this was against the expectations based on earlier studies, v) the benefit of DSR was smaller than expected on the basis of the model predictions, and vi) performance with LACE was similar to performance on an image optimized manually, indicating that LACE can be used to optimize the contrast automatically. The relatively poor results with motion and DSR are probably due to motion smear induced by a higher camera speed than used in earlier studies. Camera motion magnitude and smear are not yet implemented in TA models.

Citation Download Citation

Jaap A. Beintema, Piet Bijl, Maarten A. Hogervorst, and Judith Dijk "Target acquisition performance: effects of target aspect angle, dynamic imaging, and signal processing", Proc. SPIE 6941, Infrared Imaging Systems: Design, Analysis, Modeling, and Testing XIX, 69410C (11 April 2008); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.777561

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available