Paper
7 September 2010 Error analysis of two methods for range-images registration
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
With the improvements in range image registration techniques, this paper focuses on error analysis of two registration methods being generally applied in industry metrology including the algorithm comparison, matching error, computing complexity and different application areas. One method is iterative closest points, by which beautiful matching results with little error can be achieved. However some limitations influence its application in automatic and fast metrology. The other method is based on landmarks. We also present a algorithm for registering multiple range-images with non-coding landmarks, including the landmarks' auto-identification and sub-pixel location, 3D rigid motion, point pattern matching, global iterative optimization techniques et al. The registering results by the two methods are illustrated and a thorough error analysis is performed.
© (2010) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Xiaoli Liu, Yongkai Yin, Ameng Li, Dong He, and Xiang Peng "Error analysis of two methods for range-images registration", Proc. SPIE 7799, Mathematics of Data/Image Coding, Compression, and Encryption with Applications XII, 77990S (7 September 2010); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.860005
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Image registration

Error analysis

Optimization (mathematics)

Range image registration

3D metrology

Detection and tracking algorithms

Metrology

Back to Top