Paper
13 November 2014 Comparing digital-light-processing (DLP) and liquid-crystal-display(LCD) projection technologies for high-quality 3D shape measurement
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
This paper presents a thorough comparison between the digital-light-processing (DLP) technology and liquid-crystaldisplay (LCD) projection technology on high-quality 3D shape measurement. Specifically, each individual color channel and the combination of three channels together are studied with the focused sinusoidal pattern (FSP) method and defocused binary pattern (DBP) method. Experimental data indicated that for slow speed measurements, because of its higher contrast, DLP has the advantage for the DBP, or when the precision synchronization is presented for FSP method. Since LCD does not have rigorous timing requirements, it provides more flexibility for system development for FSP method.
© (2014) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Chen Gong, Beiwen Li, and Song Zhang "Comparing digital-light-processing (DLP) and liquid-crystal-display(LCD) projection technologies for high-quality 3D shape measurement", Proc. SPIE 9276, Optical Metrology and Inspection for Industrial Applications III, 92760Q (13 November 2014); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2071536
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Projection systems

Digital Light Processing

LCDs

3D metrology

Cameras

Polonium

3D displays

Back to Top