Dr. Wenying Hu Profile

Dr. Wenying Hu

at Yunnan Normal Univ School of Tourism and Geographical Sciences

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (1)

This will count as one of your downloads.

You will have access to both the presentation and article (if available).

DOWNLOAD NOW

This content is available for download via your institution's subscription. To access this item, please sign in to your personal account.

Email or Username Forgot your username?

Password Forgot your password?

Show

Keep me signed in

No SPIE account? Create an account

Proceedings Article | 12 March 2019 Paper

Comparison of hyperspectral retrieval models for soil moisture content

Mingli Hao, Wenying Hu

Proceedings Volume 11023, 110232E (2019) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2520021

KEYWORDS: Soil science, Reflectivity, Statistical modeling, Error analysis, Mathematical modeling, Remote sensing, Statistical analysis, Performance modeling, Data modeling, Lithium

Read Abstract +

In order to improve the estimation accuracy of Soil Moisture Content (SMC) by hyperspectral technology, the paper used actual measured spectral data to study quantitative relationship between soil hyperspectral reflectance and the SMC. All total of soil samples from the Puzhehei Scenic Spot in Qiubei County, Yunnan Province in December 2016 were measured in the lab with the spectrometer. This paper used the original reflectivity of the soil samples and its four mathematical transformations as the inversion indicators to construct Unary Linear Regression Model (ULRM), Multiple Stepwise Regression Model (MSRM) and Partial Least Squares Regression Model (PLSRM) aiming to compare the performance and inversion accuracy of these three models, and find the best performance model to inverse the SMC. The results showed that: (1) It was determined that 1350nm, 1450nm, 1841nm, 1897nm, 1905nm, 1935nm and 2146nm were the hyper-spectral characteristic bands of SMC by analyzing the correlation between soil moisture content and reflectance. (2) The coefficients of determinations R² varied between 0.73 and 0.91 and the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) ranged from 1.51 to 1.86 with the best performance obtained with the PLSM, and the LRM had the lowest inversion accuracy. (3) The PLSRM established by the logarithm of the reflectivity of 1450nm, 1841nm, 1897nm, 1905nm, 1935nm and 2146nm was the best model of the 15 models by comparing the inversion precision of the samples in each model in this study

My Library

You currently do not have any folders to save your paper to! Create a new folder below.

Folder Name

Folder Description

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks. You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*

*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please sign in to access your institution's subscriptions.

To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on SPIE.org.

ORGANIZATIONAL
Sign in with credentials provided by your organization.

Organizational Username

Organizational Password

Show/Hide Password

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members:

Non-members: ADD TO CART

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years