Photoacoustic imaging capabilities of light emitting diodes (LED) and laser sources: a comparison study

Sumit Agrawal; Mithun Kuniyil Ajith Singh; Xinyi Yang; Hussain Albahrani; Ajay Dangi; Sri-Rajasekhar Kothapalli

doi:10.1117/12.2547012

17 February 2020 Photoacoustic imaging capabilities of light emitting diodes (LED) and laser sources: a comparison study

Sumit Agrawal, Mithun Kuniyil Ajith Singh, Xinyi Yang, Hussain Albahrani, Ajay Dangi, Sri-Rajasekhar Kothapalli

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 11240, Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2020; 1124059 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2547012
Event: SPIE BiOS, 2020, San Francisco, California, United States

Abstract

Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) maps functional and molecular optical contrasts of tissue at ultrasonic spatial resolution and imaging depth. To generate detectable PA signals from deeper regions, expensive, bulky and high-energy class IV lasers are conventionally employed. Light emitting diodes (LED) have recently emerged as an alternative excitation source for PA imaging offering many advantages including portability, affordability, speed, multi-wavelength excitation, and eye/skin safety. Although the output energy of LED’s is far lower than lasers, high pulse repetition rate offers possibility to average more frames and thus improve the SNR. In this work, we performed controlled experiments on tissue-mimicking phantoms to compare the PAI performance of laser and LED light sources comprehensively. Our studies demonstrate that the LED based PA systems are ideal for low resource and point-of-care settings where the required depth of penetration is within 2-3 cms., whereas a high-energy laser is found to be more effective for higher penetration depths (<3 cm). In addition, it is clear from our results that LED-based PA imaging offers higher frame rate with similar spatial resolution and decent signal to noise ratio, which is comparable to conventional laser-based photoacoustic imaging.

Citation Download Citation

Sumit Agrawal, Mithun Kuniyil Ajith Singh, Xinyi Yang, Hussain Albahrani, Ajay Dangi, and Sri-Rajasekhar Kothapalli "Photoacoustic imaging capabilities of light emitting diodes (LED) and laser sources: a comparison study", Proc. SPIE 11240, Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2020, 1124059 (17 February 2020); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2547012

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $17.00

Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART

PROCEEDINGS
9 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Light emitting diodes

Signal to noise ratio

Fiber lasers

Photoacoustic imaging

Laser tissue interaction

Imaging systems

Laser sources

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years