A methodology for representing and assessing artificial intelligence decision aids within modeling and simulation

Joshua Wong; Emily Nack; Zachary Steelman; Seth Erway; Nathaniel D. Bastian

doi:10.1117/12.3013180

7 June 2024 A methodology for representing and assessing artificial intelligence decision aids within modeling and simulation

Joshua Wong, Emily Nack, Zachary Steelman, Seth Erway, Nathaniel D. Bastian

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 13051, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Multi-Domain Operations Applications VI; 130510K (2024) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3013180
Event: SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing, 2024, National Harbor, Maryland, United States

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is quickly gaining relevance as a transformative technology. Its ability to rapidly fuse and synthesize data, accelerate processes, automate tasks, and augment decision-making has the potential to revolutionize multi-domain warfighting through data-centric operations and algorithmic warfare. As the military relies more on AI-enabled Decision Aids to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of decision-making, it highlights the need to effectively assess them before deployment. Modeling and simulation (M&S) environments are essential for assessing these rapidly evolving AI-enabled systems. Accepted analytical frameworks are needed to guide ways to represent and model AI sufficiently within M&S environments for accurate assessment. In this paper, we identify common characteristics within the main categories of AI and investigate how those characteristics can be best represented across the main categories of M&S. We provide two use cases to highlight an assessment of AI-enabled Decision Aids for cybersecurity and aeromedical evacuation problems. Our example use cases demonstrate how to leverage a framework for analytic assessment of AI within M&S environments.

Conference Presentation

(2024) Published by SPIE. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.

Citation Download Citation

Joshua Wong, Emily Nack, Zachary Steelman, Seth Erway, and Nathaniel D. Bastian "A methodology for representing and assessing artificial intelligence decision aids within modeling and simulation", Proc. SPIE 13051, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Multi-Domain Operations Applications VI, 130510K (7 June 2024); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3013180

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available