PACS workstations in the emergency department: impact on workflow in radiology and emergency medicine

Steven C. Horii M.D.; Harold L. Kundel; Regina O. Redfern; Robert A. Lowe; Calvin F. Nodine; Stephanie B. Abbuhl; Megan Phelan; Deborah Arnold; Melissa Myers; Inna Brikman; Reuben S. Mezrich M.D.

doi:10.1117/12.386403

18 May 2000 PACS workstations in the emergency department: impact on workflow in radiology and emergency medicine

Steven C. Horii M.D., Harold L. Kundel, Regina O. Redfern, Robert A. Lowe, Calvin F. Nodine, Stephanie B. Abbuhl, Megan Phelan, Deborah Arnold, Melissa Myers, Inna Brikman, Reuben S. Mezrich M.D.

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 3980, Medical Imaging 2000: PACS Design and Evaluation: Engineering and Clinical Issues; (2000) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.386403
Event: Medical Imaging 2000, 2000, San Diego, CA, United States

Abstract

A study of timings of different events from the scheduling of an Emergency Department (ED) examination to the final reporting of it and review by the ED physician showed some expected and unexpected findings. Both computed radiography (CR) on film and CR using PACS were studied. The move of daytime reading of ED radiographs out of the Radiology reading area in the ED to a reading room in Radiology lengthened the time from when the request was sent to the time when the images were reviewed by the ED physician (1.02 hours to 1.29 hours). Despite anecdotal reports of increased reading time at workstations, the radiologists' use of PACS for reading ED radiographs resulted in a slight improvement in the time between the examination completion and report dictation (0.43 hours to 0.3 hours). Recently, we have found that there may be a workload effect on this time and this is presently being analyzed. The time from the sending of the request for an examination to the first review of the images by the ED physician was shortened with implementation of a PACS workstation in the clinical area of the ED (1.35 hours to 0.92 hours). A surprising finding was the impact the change to PACS had on the time between sending the request and the technologist's completion of the requested examination. The time increased with PACS from 0.45 hours for film-based CR to 0.8 hours for PACS. Several studies are ongoing to determine the causes of this increase.

Citation Download Citation

Steven C. Horii M.D., Harold L. Kundel, Regina O. Redfern, Robert A. Lowe, Calvin F. Nodine, Stephanie B. Abbuhl, Megan Phelan, Deborah Arnold, Melissa Myers, Inna Brikman, and Reuben S. Mezrich M.D. "PACS workstations in the emergency department: impact on workflow in radiology and emergency medicine", Proc. SPIE 3980, Medical Imaging 2000: PACS Design and Evaluation: Engineering and Clinical Issues, (18 May 2000); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.386403

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available