1.IntroductionLaser speckle contrast imaging is a non-invasive imaging technique widely employed in biomedical studies to evaluate and monitor blood flow perfusion. It utilizes the time variation of laser speckle patterns, which are randomly varying interference patterns caused by the scattering of moving particles (e.g., red blood cells in the vasculature). The relative velocity of moving particles can be obtained by calculating the speckle index, which indicates the contrast variation in the laser speckle contrast image (LSCI).1 The LSCI can be obtained by utilizing the spatial mode algorithm, which is useful for monitoring blood flow perfusion as a function of time, or the temporal mode algorithm, which is useful for comparing blood flow perfusion before and after an event. The spatial mode algorithm is based on moving averaging of window pixels in an image, which determines the spatial resolution and speckle contrast. In general, or windows are employed; however, the averaging window size depends on the hardware configuration, speckle contrast, and spatial resolution.2,3 The temporal mode algorithm is based on pixel averaging at the same pixel location after acquiring multiple images and provides higher spatial resolution than the spatial mode algorithm.4 The ability to obtain LSCIs in real-time depends on the speed of image acquisition and processing, as well as the computer performance. LSCIs have been widely used in various clinical applications, such as diagnosis of keloids classification,5–9 burn evaluation,10–13 observation of microcirculation following treatment,14–17 robot-assisted surgery,18 intraoperative cerebral blood flow monitoring,19–21 surgery monitoring,22–25 reperfusion evaluation after tissue transplantation,26,27 prediction of tissue necrosis risk,28–30 and reperfusion evaluation after oral wound healing.31,32 To ensure accurate measurement in the region of interest, the imaging region of interest (IROI) must be matched with the LSCI displayed on the monitor screen, which may be time-consuming due to potential spatial mismatching between the IROI and the monitor screen. To address the issue, previous studies have tried aligning the LSCI with a white light image on a monitor screen19,33 or using a projector to overlay an LSCI on a surgical microscope.34 Another promising study involved near-infrared subcutaneous vein imaging based on a projection mapping (PM) that selectively extracted the vein morphology and projected it onto the IROI to observe the vein morphology in the IROI directly.35 This study proposes a PM system for LSCIs (PMS_LSCI) that projects LSCIs to observe the blood flow perfusion in the IROI directly, eliminating the requirement of the monitor screen. The spatial mismatching between the IROI and projection region of interest (PROI) was quantitatively evaluated by conducting in-vitro vascular optical tissue phantom and in-vivo human studies. Graphic user interface (GUI) software was developed using MATLAB (MATLAB, MathWorks) for image acquisition and processing in the PMS_LSCI. 2.Materials and Methods2.1.Development of PMS_LSCIFigure 1(a) shows the schematic illustration of the PMS_LSCI consisting of a 785 nm diode laser (L785P090, Thorlabs), optical diffuser (#35-869, Edmund Optics), monochrome camera (DCC3240N, Thorlabs), optical imaging lens (#67-714, Edmund Optics), bandpass filter (#65-723, Edmunds Optics) in front of the lens, laser projector (MP-CL1, Canon, Japan), and beam splitter (#62-882, Edmunds Optics) aligned at 45 deg. Fig. 1(a) Schematic of the projection imaging system for LSCI, (b) computation window of LSCI in spatial (upper image) mode based on moving averaging of window pixels in an image and temporal (lower image) mode based on pixel-by-pixel averaging at the same pixel location in multiple images, and (c) flowchart of the GUI software used to compute LSCI in spatial or temporal mode. ![]() To ensure clear imaging, the PMS_LSCI utilized a fixed working distance of 15 cm with a field of view of 23.9 deg, providing an IROI area of , and did not use other working distances that could result in image blurring. The laser projector with resolution was placed perpendicular to the camera by using the beam splitter to project the LSCI onto the IROI. A diffuse reflectance target (SRT-99-100, Labsphere Inc.) with 99% reflectance was placed at the working distance to evaluate the laser distribution in the IROI. The evaluation was performed by calculating the coefficient of variation, which is the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean. The laser speckle image was acquired from the diffuse reflectance target in a dark room and column-averaged to obtain the two-dimensional (2D) beam profile for calculating the coefficient of variation. MATLAB was used to develop GUI software that mainly acquires laser speckle images and computes LSCIs in either spatial or temporal mode. In this study, the LSCI in spatial mode was used for potential real-time PM in the IROI because this mode is faster than the temporal mode. The computer was equipped with a CPU (i7-1075H, Intel), 32 GB of memory, and a graphics processing unit (GTX 1650Ti, NVIDIA). Figures 1(b) and 1(c) show the schematics of the computation window of LSCI in spatial (upper image) and temporal (lower image) modes and the flowchart of the GUI software to compute the LSCI, respectively. 2.2.Evaluation of Spatial Matching in the Regions of InterestThe spatial matching between the IROI and PROI is very important in PMS_LSCI. Although the LSCI can be obtained without markers and projected, ensuring spatial matching between the IROI and PROI may be difficult. The LSCI must be precisely projected in the identical IROI to avoid blood perfusion artifacts due to spatial mismatching in the regions of interest (SMROI). White light images were obtained from a right lower arm and hand with square and circular markers to mask the exact shapes and positions in PM accurately. These images were projected onto the IROI by manually adjusting the position of the GUI screen to match the markers of the PROI spatially to those of the IROI. The SMROI was evaluated by calculating the number of pixels mismatched in the displacement of markers between the IROI and PROI. This evaluation was also performed in both in-vitro and in-vivo studies using the LSCI instead of white light images. 2.3.In-Vitro Evaluation of PMS_LSCIAn in-vitro evaluation of the PMS_LSCI was performed using a vascular optical tissue phantom made from room temperature-vulcanizing silicone with optical tissue properties at 785 nm. A square marker was attached to the vascular optical tissue phantom to investigate the SMROI. A milk solution was circulated through the vascular optical tissue phantom by a peristaltic pump (PP-150D, PLTECH, Korea) to simulate blood flow. LSCIs were obtained at various revolutions per minute (RPM) (60, 80, 100, and 120) and projected onto the vascular optical tissue phantom as a function of RPM. The PM of the LSCI was imaged using a smartphone camera that was closely placed to the beam splitter. To quantify the LSCI, the blood flow index was calculated as .36 The statistical analysis of the relationship between blood flow index and RPM was performed using IBM SPSS software (SPSS 22.0, IBM). A paired-sample -test was used to compare the blood flow index between the two groups, and statistical significance was determined if . 2.4.In-Vivo Evaluation of PMS_LSCITo investigate the SMROI due to surface curvature, LSCIs were obtained by attaching square markers on various parts of the hand, such as the volar wrist, fingers, and flat and curved dorsal hands. The SMROI was evaluated by calculating the displacement of the markers between the IROI and PROI. A sphygmomanometer cuff was applied to the right upper arm to control blood flow and evaluate changes in blood perfusion in the hand. The LSCIs were acquired and projected onto the IROI at four different states: normal without occlusion, occlusion by tightening the cuff, reperfusion by releasing the cuff, and returning to normal 2 min after releasing the cuff. The in-vivo experiment was approved by the Bioethics Committee of Yonsei University (1041849-202111-BM-192-01). 3.Results3.1.Development of PMS_LSCIFigures 2(a) and 2(b) show the 2D and three-dimensional (3D) beam distribution profiles of the laser speckle image on the diffuse reflectance target, respectively. The 2D beam profile was obtained by averaging the columns of Fig. 1(a). The coefficient of variation was 0.44% (), indicating a nearly even and flat laser distribution. Although the light influence of the laser projector was not measured in the LSCI, it was not observed in the LSCI because the laser projector could use an RGB laser combination to produce color projection. The LSCI was obtained at 785 nm by integrating a 785 nm diode laser and bandpass filter, avoiding potential light interference from the laser projector. Fig. 2(a) 2D and (b) 3D beam distribution profiles of laser speckle image on a diffuse reflectance target with 99% reflectance. ![]() Figure 3 shows the GUI software that captures and displays streaming laser speckle images in the “STREAMING” window and LSCIs in the “AVERAGED IMAGE” window, with an adjustable pseudo color bar. The “MODE” button enables users to switch laser speckle image and LSCI in spatial or temporal mode. The “PLAY” button starts or stops the video of the LSCI. The “AVERAGE” button averages the streaming laser speckle images and displays them in the “AVERAGED IMAGE” window. The “SAVE” button enables users to save the laser speckle image, grayscale or colormap LSCI, or both images. Video images can be acquired using the red “VIDEO RECORDING” button. 3.2.Evaluation of Spatial Matching in the Regions of InterestFigures 4(a)–4(c) show the PMs of white light images on the flat volar wrist, dorsal hand with both flat and curved surfaces, and dorsal hand in a fist position to emphasize the curved surface of the human body, respectively. The SMROI was , 5.56%, and 6.47% for the cases in Figs. 4(a)–4(c), respectively. Although the SMROI was not significant on the flat and curved surfaces, it was higher on the curved surface, as expected. Fig. 4Evaluation of spatial matching in the regions of interest in which white light images were obtained and projected onto the IROI of the (a) flat volar wrist, (b) flat dorsal hand, and (c) dorsal hand fist. The square and circular markers were used to evaluate the spatial matching between the IROI and PROI. ![]() 3.3.In-Vitro Evaluation of PMS_LSCIFigure 5 shows the LSCIs (upper images) and their PMs (lower images) on the vascular optical tissue phantom at (a) 60, (b) 80, (c) 100, and (d) 120 RPM. The pseudo color bar represents the relative velocity, where high and low velocity correspond to low (closer to speckle index 0) and high (closer to speckle index 1) laser speckle contrast, respectively. The SMROI was 1.26% at the square marker between the IROI and PROI, ensuring that the PROI was accurately matched with the IROI. As expected, the bright linear tubing region, due to the scattering of moving particles, presented velocity variations as a function of RPM. However, the outside of the tubing region presented no speckle contrast variation. Fig. 5LSCIs (upper images) obtained at (a) 60, (b) 80, (c) 100, and (d) 120 RPM from vascular optical tissue phantom, and PMs (lower images) of the LSCIs on the identical vascular optical tissue phantom. The square marker was used to evaluate the spatial matching between imaging and projection regions of interest. The bright linear region is tubing with moving particles. ![]() Figure 6 illustrates the blood flow indices of , , , and at 60, 80, 100, and 120 RPM, respectively. The blood flow indices linearly increased in the tubing region as a function of RPM, and no significant differences were observed outside the tubing region. Fig. 6Blood flow index inside and outside the tubing region of a vascular optical tissue phantom. The tubing region presents an increase in the blood flow index as a function of RPM. The outside of the tubing region exhibits no variation in the blood flow index, as expected because there were no moving particles. ![]() 3.4.In-Vivo Evaluation of PMS_LSCIFigure 7 shows the PMs of LSCIs on the (a) flat volar wrist, (b) fingers, (c) curvature, and (d) flat dorsal hands with square markers and number lettering for the SMROI investigation. The SMROI was 2.67%, 2.75%, 4.77%, and 2.41% in Figs. 7(a)–7(d), respectively. The maximum SMROI was , demonstrating high spatial matching between the IROI and PROI. Various colormaps were tested and determined as the current one in terms of visibility on skin. Fig. 7PMs of LSCIs at the (a) volar wrist, (b) fingers, (c) curvature, and (d) flat dorsal hands. The square markers and number lettering were used to evaluate the spatial matching between the IROI and PROI. ![]() Figure 8 shows the PMs of LSCIs at four different blood flows: (a) normal, (b) occlusion, (c) release, and (d) back to normal. A square marker on the middle finger was used to evaluate the SMROI. The PM provides a direct visualization of the blood flow perfusion as a function of time in the IROI. The blood flow perfusion was decreased during occlusion and increased after release. The blood flow perfusions in the normal and back to normal states were similar. 4.DiscussionThe PM has been widely used by artists and advertisers in various settings, such as buildings, objects, the human body, media arts, and theatrical stages. Various commercial PM software packages, such as “Isadora,” “MadMapper,” “Resolume Arena,” “TouchDesigner,” “Millumin 3,” and “QLab,” have been used to project images or videos spatially onto the surfaces of objects by interfacing with a projector. In this study, PM was performed by adjusting the GUI screen to align the LSCI with the IROI. The GUI software may have the potential to enable real-time PM by employing the algorithms of commercial PM software packages and higher performance computers and projectors. Accurate identification of lesions is important in clinical diagnosis and treatment. However, it may be challenging and time-consuming to identify the actual lesions precisely from LSCIs displayed on a monitor screen. The PM of LSCIs may address this issue by providing direct and accurate identification of the actual lesions, minimizing the spatial mismatching between the monitor screen and the actual lesion. This study evaluated the clinical feasibility of the PMS_LSCI using a relatively low-performance computer, which may cause a time delay in real-time PM due to the computational demand of LSCI, resulting in a lower frame rate than a camera. The computation time for a single LSCI frame was , which is comparable to 10 frames per second. Although the current GUI software did not employ the software development kit of the camera, the LSCI could be increased up to 26 frames per second by using the software development kit in a simple test program. In future studies, the GUI software should be upgraded to provide a faster frame rate by incorporating the software development kit into the algorithm. Furthermore, the image processing time of the PMS_LSCI may be enhanced for real-time PM by employing a higher performance computer equipped with an advanced graphics processing unit, which is efficient at manipulating computer graphics and image processing. In this study, the laser source was aligned at 45 deg to the camera, resulting in the shadow artifact in the LSCI and PM, as shown in Figs. 5, 7, and 8. This artifact may be minimized by aligning the laser source and projector linearly with the camera, eliminating the need for a beam splitter. In addition, although a 90 mW laser was used in this study, a higher power laser may further improve the contrast of the raw laser speckle image and, therefore, enhance the LSCI. The SMROI may be increased, particularly on non-planar, curved surfaces of the human body. The surface curvature artifact may be effectively resolved in future studies by using Bézier Patches’ recursive subdivision37 and distortion correction method38–40 and calibrating the 3D shapes of curved surfaces.41,42 In addition, the curvature artifact may be further minimized by restricting the IROI to a small region that minimizes the surface curvature artifact. In future studies, the curvature artifact may be studied using in-vitro objects with irregular surface curvature and applying the appropriate algorithms. In addition, the PMS_LSCI may be applied to various anatomic regions to investigate the curvature artifact in various clinical applications. The LSCI is effective for evaluating vasculature diseases. The PMS_LSCI may provide real-time and direct monitoring of the vascular destruction on port wine stain lesions during laser therapy and, therefore, aid in determining the appropriate photon energy for each lesion based on the degree of the port wine stain. The PMS_LSCI may also be utilized in burn evaluation by providing direct and regional monitoring of the degree of burn on the lesion. In tissue transplantation, monitoring the healing progress is important to prevent tissue necrosis and determine the need for reoperation on necrotic lesions. The PMS_LSCI may also provide direct and regional monitoring of tissue necrosis on the lesion. PM has been recently used for magnetic resonance imaging in breast-conserving surgery and cancer detection using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging.43–45 It may also be applied to other various 2D functional surface imaging modalities. In a previous study, actinic keratosis was successfully detected using a cross-polarization facial color imaging modality. However, it was challenging to identify and demarcate the facial actinic keratosis lesion precisely in the IROI for treatment. The PM may be combined with the imaging modality to project the processed image onto the IROI, simplifying the demarcation of actinic keratosis lesions. The PM of functional or morphological 2D surface images is expected to provide direct regional information in the IROI for diagnosis and treatment. Although this study was focused on the PM of LSCIs to evaluate blood flow perfusion, the PMS_LSCI may also be utilized for monitoring blood flow in open cardiac and neurosurgeries that may require intensive concentration and spatial matching in the regions of interest during surgery. Previous LSCI studies have been conducted in open vasculature, providing high resolution LSCIs for fine vasculature.19–21,46 The detection resolution of fine vasculature may be expected to reach that in previous LSCI studies of open vasculature with an SMROI based on the maximum SMROI of 6.4% on the curved surface in this study. 5.ConclusionThis study proposed the PMS_LSCI to observe an LSCI directly in the IROI instead of on a monitor screen by utilizing PM of the LSCI. Although further studies are needed for various clinical applications, this study demonstrated the clinical feasibility of this approach through both in-vitro and in-vivo experiments. In future studies, the computation time of image processing should be improved to achieve real-time PM of the LSCI by using higher performance computers and incorporating the software development kit of the camera into the algorithm. AcknowledgmentsThis research was supported by the Regional Innovation Strategy (RIS) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) (2022RIS-005). ReferencesD. A. Boas and A. K. Dunn,
“Laser speckle contrast imaging in biomedical optics,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 15
(1), 011109 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3285504 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2010).
Google Scholar
J. Senarathna et al.,
“Laser speckle contrast imaging: theory, instrumentation and applications,”
IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng., 6 99
–110 https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2013.2243140
(2013).
Google Scholar
D. Briers et al.,
“Laser speckle contrast imaging: theoretical and practical limitations,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 18
(6), 066018 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.6.066018 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2013).
Google Scholar
J. C. Ramirez-San-Juan et al.,
“Spatial versus temporal laser speckle contrast analyses in the presence of static optical scatterers,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 19
(10), 106009 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.10.106009 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2014).
Google Scholar
C. Chen et al.,
“Heterogeneous features of keloids assessed by laser speckle contrast imaging: a cross-sectional study,”
Lasers Surg. Med., 53
(6), 865
–871 https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23331 LSMEDI 0196-8092
(2021).
Google Scholar
C. Xu et al.,
“Laser speckle contrast imaging for the objective assessment of blood perfusion in keloids treated with dual-wavelength laser therapy,”
Dermatol. Surg., 47
(4), e117
–e121 https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000002836
(2021).
Google Scholar
Y. Yang et al.,
“Blood perfusion in hypertrophic scars and keloids studied by laser speckle contrast imaging,”
Skin Res. Technol., 27
(5), 789
–796 https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.13020
(2021).
Google Scholar
Q. Liu et al.,
“Increased blood flow in keloids and adjacent skin revealed by laser speckle contrast imaging,”
Lasers Surg. Med., 48
(4), 360
–364 https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22470 LSMEDI 0196-8092
(2016).
Google Scholar
W. Li et al.,
“Skin endothelial cell and microcirculation function study in recurred keloids patients after keloid surgery and radiotherapy,”
Medicine, 101
(43), e31286 https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031286 MEDIAV 0025-7974
(2022).
Google Scholar
M. Elmasry et al.,
“Laser speckle contrast imaging in children with scalds: its influence on timing of intervention, duration of healing and care, and costs,”
Burns, 45
(4), 798
–804 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2019.02.001 BURND8 0305-4179
(2019).
Google Scholar
K. J. Zheng et al.,
“Validity of laser speckle contrast imaging for the prediction of burn wound healing potential,”
Burns, 48
(2), 319
–327 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2021.04.028 BURND8 0305-4179
(2022).
Google Scholar
R. Mirdell et al.,
“Accuracy of laser speckle contrast imaging in the assessment of pediatric scald wounds,”
Burns, 44
(1), 90
–98 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2017.06.010 BURND8 0305-4179
(2018).
Google Scholar
R. Mirdell et al.,
“Interobserver reliability of laser speckle contrast imaging in the assessment of burns,”
Burns, 45
(6), 1325
–1335 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2019.01.011 BURND8 0305-4179
(2019).
Google Scholar
E. V. Potapova et al.,
“A multiparametric approach to the assessment of cutaneous microcirculation in dermatological patients (on the example of patients with psoriasis),”
Hum. Physiol., 47
(6), 619
–627 https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119721050091 HUPHDC 0362-1197
(2021).
Google Scholar
D. C. Bosanquet et al.,
“Microcirculatory flux and pulsatility in arterial leg ulcers is increased by intermittent neuromuscular electrostimulation of the common peroneal nerve,”
Ann. Vasc. Surg., 71 308
–314 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2020.07.030 AVSUEV 0890-5096
(2021).
Google Scholar
J. Berggren et al.,
“Reperfusion of free full-thickness skin grafts in periocular reconstructive surgery monitored using laser speckle contrast imaging,”
Ophthalmic Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 37
(4), 324
–328 https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000001851
(2021).
Google Scholar
A. Bradshaw et al.,
“MP65-14 a novel laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) technique to evaluate penile microcirculatory dysfunction in patients with Peyronie’s disease,”
J. Urol., 201
(Suppl. 4), e955 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0000556926.18602.43
(2019).
Google Scholar
Y. Z. Liu et al.,
“Utility and usability of laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) for displaying real-time tissue perfusion/blood flow in robot-assisted surgery (RAS): comparison to indocyanine green (ICG) and use in laparoscopic surgery,”
Surg. Endosc., 37
(6), 4803
–4811 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09590-3
(2022).
Google Scholar
D. R. Miller et al.,
“Continuous blood flow visualization with laser speckle contrast imaging during neurovascular surgery,”
Neurophotonics, 9
(2), 021908 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.9.2.021908
(2022).
Google Scholar
A. B. Parthasarathy et al.,
“Laser speckle contrast imaging of cerebral blood flow in humans during neurosurgery: a pilot clinical study,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 15
(6), 066030 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3526368 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2010).
Google Scholar
L. M. Richards et al.,
“Intraoperative multi-exposure speckle imaging of cerebral blood flow,”
J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab., 37
(9), 3097
–3109 https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X16686987
(2017).
Google Scholar
W. Heeman et al.,
“Application of laser speckle contrast imaging in laparoscopic surgery,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 10
(4), 2010
–2019 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.002010 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2019).
Google Scholar
R. Sheikh et al.,
“Optimal epinephrine concentration and time delay to minimize perfusion in eyelid surgery: measured by laser-based methods and a novel form of extended-wavelength diffuse reflectance spectroscopy,”
Ophthalmic Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 34
(2), 123
–129 https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000000883
(2018).
Google Scholar
E. A. Mannoh et al.,
“Intraoperative assessment of parathyroid viability using laser speckle contrast imaging,”
Sci. Rep., 7
(1), 14798 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14941-5 SRCEC3 2045-2322
(2017).
Google Scholar
L. Engqvist, R. Sheikh and U. Dahlstrand,
“Laser speckle contrast imaging enables perfusion monitoring of the anterior segment during eye muscle surgery,”
J. A.A.P.O.S, 26
(3), 155
–158 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2022.02.006
(2022).
Google Scholar
K. Tenland et al.,
“Successful free bilamellar eyelid grafts for the repair of upper and lower eyelid defects in patients and laser speckle contrast imaging of revascularization,”
Ophthalmic Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 37
(2), 168
–172 https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000001724
(2021).
Google Scholar
J. V. Berggren et al.,
“Laser speckle contrast imaging of the blood perfusion in glabellar flaps used to repair medial canthal defects,”
Ophthalmic Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 38
(3), 274
–279 https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002082
(2022).
Google Scholar
M. B. Bin Khashru,
“Laser speckle contrast imaging, a feasible device for monitoring postoperative microcirculation: a case report,”
J. Orthopaedics Sports Med., 2
(1), 18
–23 https://doi.org/10.26502/josm.51150017
(2020).
Google Scholar
K. Knudsen et al.,
“Laser speckle contrast imaging to evaluate bowel lesions in neonates with NEC,”
Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. Rep., 5
(1), e43
–e46 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1606196
(2017).
Google Scholar
J. Zötterman et al.,
“Intraoperative laser speckle contrast imaging in DIEP breast reconstruction: a prospective case series study,”
Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open, 8
(1), e2529 https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002529
(2020).
Google Scholar
B. Molnár et al.,
“Assessment of palatal mucosal wound healing following connective-tissue harvesting by laser speckle contrast imaging: an observational case series study,”
Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 39
(2), e64
–e70 https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.3878
(2019).
Google Scholar
E. Molnár et al.,
“Evaluation of laser speckle contrast imaging for the assessment of oral mucosal blood flow following periodontal plastic surgery: an exploratory study,”
Biomed. Res. Int., 2017 4042902 https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4042902
(2017).
Google Scholar
D. R. Miller et al.,
“Intraoperative real-time and continuous cerebral blood flow visualization with laser speckle contrast imaging,”
Proc. SPIE, 11945 1194502 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2608914 PSISDG 0277-786X
(2022).
Google Scholar
A. Mangraviti et al.,
“Intraoperative laser speckle contrast imaging for real-time visualization of cerebral blood flow in cerebrovascular surgery: results from pre-clinical studies,”
Sci. Rep., 10
(1), 7614 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64492-5 SRCEC3 2045-2322
(2020).
Google Scholar
C. T. Pan et al.,
“Vein pattern locating technology for cannulation: a review of the low-cost vein finder prototypes utilizing near infrared (NIR) light to improve peripheral subcutaneous vein selection for phlebotomy,”
Sensors, 19
(16), 3573 https://doi.org/10.3390/s19163573 SNSRES 0746-9462
(2019).
Google Scholar
P. Stenström et al.,
“Perfusion monitoring using laser speckle contrast imaging during endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease,”
J. Pediatr. Surg. Case Rep., 76
(8), 102142 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsc.2021.102142
(2022).
Google Scholar
A. Ahmed et al.,
“Geometric correction for uneven quadric projection surfaces using recursive subdivision of bézier patches,”
ETRI J., 35
(6), 1115
–1125 https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.13.0112.0597
(2013).
Google Scholar
J. Park and B.-U. Lee,
“Defocus and geometric distortion correction for projected images on a curved surface,”
Appl. Opt., 55
(4), 896
–902 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.55.000896 APOPAI 0003-6935
(2016).
Google Scholar
R. Raskar et al.,
“Quadric transfer for immersive curved screen displays,”
Comput. Graph. Forum, 23
(3), 451
–460 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2004.00776.x CGFODY 0167-7055
(2004).
Google Scholar
J. Park et al.,
“Perturbation of quadric transfer due to deformation of curved screen displays,”
Opt. Express, 19
(17), 16236
–16243 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.016236 OPEXFF 1094-4087
(2011).
Google Scholar
R. Raskar et al., 3D talking heads: image based modeling at interactive rate using structured light projection
(1998). Google Scholar
R. Raskar et al.,
“The office of the future: a unified approach to image-based modeling and spatially immersive displays,”
in Proc. 25th Annu. Conf. Comput. Graph. and Interactive Tech.,
179
–188
(1998). https://doi.org/10.1145/280814.280861 Google Scholar
M. Takada et al.,
“Real-time navigation system for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients using projection mapping with indocyanine green fluorescence,”
Breast Cancer, 25
(6), 650
–655 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-018-0868-2 BCATDJ 0161-0112
(2018).
Google Scholar
T. F. Chen-Yoshikawa et al.,
“Clinical application of projection mapping technology for surgical resection of lung metastasis,”
Interact Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg., 25
(6), 1010
–1011 https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivx247
(2017).
Google Scholar
M. Amano et al.,
“Development of MRI projection mapping system for breast-conserving surgery in the operating room: preliminary clinical results in invasive breast cancer,”
Biomed. Res. Int., 2020 5314120 https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5314120
(2020).
Google Scholar
T. Son et al.,
“Observation of vasculature alternation by intense pulsed light combined with physicochemical methods,”
Microvasc Res., 105
(May), 47
–53 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2016.01.001
(2016).
Google Scholar
|
Laser speckle contrast imaging
Speckle
Blood circulation
Displays
Tissues
Projection systems
In vivo imaging