1.IntroductionThe skin features an inherent structure that provides strength and flexibility, functioning as a protective shield for softer, deeper tissues. The skin is subject to forces arising from body mechanics, such as joint movements and muscle contractions, as well as external factors, including physical insults and surgeries. Thus, the skin should be able to withstand applied forces (tensile strength), stretch without losing its structural integrity (extensibility), recoil back to its original form (elasticity), and regenerate original properties following an injury to maintain proper body functions.1 Nonetheless, dermal biomechanical properties may be compromised by various factors, such as aging 2 and disease,3 potentially impeding its optimal function. Therefore, understanding the alterations in the biomechanical properties of the skin is crucial in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, particularly in designing effective skin substitutes and enhancing the success rates of skin grafts. The mechanical properties of the skin are predominantly governed by the collagen and elastin components of the extracellular matrix (ECM), a non-cellular network of proteins and carbohydrates that provides structural and biomechanical support to the surrounding cells.4,5 The collagen and elastin fibers influence the tensile6–8 and elastic8–11 properties of the skin, respectively. The dysregulated composition of these fibers can disrupt tissue mechanics through excessive matrix deposition, remodeling, and degradation, potentially leading to fibrosis.12–15 In tissue engineering, growth factors, such as transforming growth factor-beta (), are often used to increase the deposition of collagen and elastin in various tissues, including the skin, lungs, liver, and kidneys.16,17 , a multifunctional cytokine, stimulates the synthesis of collagen and glycosaminoglycans within the skin. It influences fibroblast differentiation into myofibroblasts, playing a key role in wound contraction and remodeling.18 also upregulates the expression of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases, which inhibit the activity of matrix metalloproteinases that are responsible for ECM degradation.19 This results in an imbalance between ECM synthesis and degradation, leading to the accumulation of ECM proteins and the development of fibrosis.20 Ex vivo scaffold-based skin offers a robust platform for evaluating -induced changes in mechanical characteristics, serving as a valuable approach for developing tissue-engineered skin substitutes that mimic the structure and function of the native skin. It provides a controlled and reproducible environment for studying specific tissue responses and behavior outside the complexities of an in vivo setting.21 While there is substantial evidence elucidating the influence of on ECM constructs,22–24 a notable research gap exists in exploring the mechanical properties of skin scaffolds in response to . Several techniques, such as tensile, suction, torsion, and twisting tests, can be used to evaluate skin scaffold mechanical properties.25 Nevertheless, noninvasive, in situ measurements are advantageous for maintaining the integrity of delicate skin scaffolds, rendering imaging techniques such as ultrasound and optical elastography more suitable due to their non-destructive nature. Research on imaging the elastic properties of the skin using ultrasound elastography (USE) is growing, such as for detecting systemic sclerosis.26–28 However, USE has worse structural and elastic resolution compared with optical techniques such as optical coherence elastography (OCE) and Brillouin microscopy.29 Prior studies have demonstrated the potential of OCE in quantifying skin biomechanical properties in both healthy30–32 and diseased conditions, including systemic sclerosis in vivo in preclinical and clinical settings.33,34 Wave-based OCE,35 air-coupled ultrasound OCE (ACUS-OCE) in particular,36 measures minute displacements () induced by non-contact acoustic radiation force (ARF). The ensuing propagation speed of the mechanical wave is then quantified, which correlates with the inherent shear modulus of the tissue.35 Similarly, Brillouin microscopy has shown promise for non-invasively mapping the Brillouin frequency shift (GHz range), which corresponds to the longitudinal elastic modulus (GPa range) of tissues, with high spatial resolution.37 In this study, we employ both ACUS-OCE and Brillouin microscopy to evaluate the biomechanical response of skin scaffolds to treatment. Our prior work has highlighted the effectiveness of these optical techniques in offering complementary insights into tissue mechanical properties.38,39 A correlation may exist between the shear modulus obtained from OCE and the longitudinal modulus estimated using Brillouin microscopy due to their common dependence on tissue structural components like collagen fibers, ECM structure, and water content. However, such correlations are not always guaranteed in complex tissues, and therefore, measuring both moduli is often necessary for precise characterization, highlighting the potential of this combined approach to provide comprehensive tissue biomechanical properties. Such an approach would overcome the trade-off between the slower yet high elastic-resolution Brillouin microscopy and the faster and more quantitative imaging capabilities with a broader field of view offered by OCE. 2.Materials and Methods2.1.Skin Scaffold SamplesSkin scaffold samples were prepared in two sets, each in a 96-well transwell plate, at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), NIH, Maryland, United States. In plate 1, aprotinin (AP) was maintained in the culture media throughout skin sample growth, whereas the AP in plate 2 was removed during the final 6 days of the culture. The removal of AP from the second group aimed to eliminate potential masking effects on stiffness differences caused by fibroblast-induced collagen secretion, as AP is known for inhibiting fibrin gel degradation.40 Each plate consisted of three sample subgroups, resulting in a total of six sample sets. The first subgroup served as a control (CTL), the second subgroup was treated with , and the third subgroup was treated with both and of a receptor 1 inhibitor, Galunisertib (LY2157299), hereafter referred to as galunisertib.41 Dimethyl sulfoxide was used as a control. The cultures were developed in transwell inserts with an effective area of . A roughly -thick membrane within the scaffolds separated the epidermis and dermis layers, which were cultured at the apical and basolateral sides of the insert, respectively. The samples were transported overnight to the University of Houston for elasticity imaging using Brillouin microscopy and OCE. 2.2.Imaging Systems and Data AcquisitionTo preserve the structural integrity of the skin scaffolds and facilitate high-throughput imaging, measurements were performed directly on the intact samples within the transwell inserts. During imaging experiments, the transwell inserts were flipped to enable measurements from the basolateral side, as illustrated in Fig. 1(a). This orientation permitted the direct scanning of the dermis layer using both OCE and the Brillouin systems, thereby enabling effective assessment of the mechanical properties of the dermis. In addition, the experiments were carefully timed to ensure that measurements took place within seconds after inverting the transwell, preserving the skin structure’s freshness. The ACUS-OCE system utilized a phase-sensitive spectral-domain OCT (PhS-OCT) system to track the propagation of low amplitude () mechanical waves induced by ACUS excitation. The excitation method was implemented using a hollow hemispherical ACUS transducer featuring a circular opening of 10 mm at the apex for confocal OCT imaging.36 Positioned at a focal distance of from the sample, the ACUS transducer, operating at a 1 MHz resonant frequency, generated a focused ARF on the sample, roughly at the center of the inverted transwell insert and surface of the skin sample. To drive the transducer, a function generator (DG4162, RIGOL Tech, Beijing, China) generated a 1 MHz sinusoidal wave that was amplitude modulated with a rectangular pulse train comprising five cycles at 2 kHz. The modulated signal was then amplified using a 55-dB power amplifier (1040L, Electronics & Innovation, Ltd, Rochester, New York, United States) before driving the transducer. The induced mechanical waves were imaged using the PhS-OCT system, employing a superluminescent diode (Broadlighter S840-I-B-20, Superlum, Cobh Cross, Ireland) with a central wavelength of 840 nm and full-width-half-maximum bandwidth of . The system had an axial resolution of (in air) and a displacement sensitivity of 0.28 nm. For each sample, the data acquisition process involved two M-B mode scans,42 covering a lateral distance of 3.95 and 3.96 mm along the orthogonal and axes, respectively, as shown in Fig. 1(a). Temporal data were collected with 1000 A-lines per M-mode scan at an A-line acquisition rate of 25 kHz, and 1000 lateral locations were probed per B-scan. A custom MATLAB® R2023a script (Mathworks, Inc., Massachusetts, United States) was used to process the spatio-temporal data. Briefly, standard OCE signal processing techniques were applied to the raw M-B interferograms to remove background noise and motion artifacts.42,43 A spatio-temporal displacement map was generated by applying a fast Fourier transform (FFT) to the denoised data and extracting the temporally unwrapped phase at each axial pixel.36,44 The speed of the mechanical wave was then quantified as the slope of the linear fit of the primary peak of wave propagation to the propagation distance along the skin scaffold surface. This procedure was repeated for subsurface sample layers over a thickness of , and a mean wave speed was computed for each M-B mode acquisition, enhancing the accuracy of the estimated speed. Mechanical characterization with Brillouin microscopy was performed using a home-built multimodal Brillouin-OCT setup.45 The Brillouin sub-system consisted of a 660-nm single-mode laser source (Torus; Laser Quantum Inc., Fremont, California, United States), with power on the sample. The Brillouin frequency shift was detected by a spectrometer composed of a dual-stage virtually imaged phase array (VIPA) spectrometer with of free spectral range. The Brillouin spectrometer was calibrated with standard materials, including water and acetone, before each measurement. Brillouin measurements were acquired with a microscope objective with 0.25 numerical aperture, resulting in a lateral resolution of , and an axial resolution of , which were measured using a beam profiler (LaserCam-HR II; Coherent Inc., Santa Clara, California, United States). The backscattered light collected from the sample was transferred to a dual-stage VIPA spectrometer through a single-mode optical fiber. An electron-multiplying charge-coupled device camera (iXon Andor, Belfast, United Kingdom) was used to detect the Brillouin frequency shift. The exposure time of the camera was 0.1 s during all measurements. Brillouin images were acquired along a 1.3-mm lateral region (10 pixels) and 0.3 mm axially (25 axial pixels along the thickness of the skin). The total acquisition period was 25 s per sample. The Brillouin system was co-aligned with a swept-source OCT system with a central wavelength of 1310 nm, bandwidth of 105 nm, and A-scan rate of 50 kHz for structural image-guided Brillouin measurements, as shown in Fig. 1(b). The multimodal system ensured the Brillouin measurements were taken at approximately the center of each transwell. 3.ResultsFigure 2 shows a typical structural image of the skin scaffold reconstructed from a 3D OCT scan. OCE measurements were performed at the depth cross-sections situated in the and planes crossing the center of the volume image depicted in Fig. 2(a). As shown in Fig. 2(b), the structure of the tissue comprises a much thicker dermis layer at the top, a membrane layer of in the middle, and an epidermis layer at the bottom. Both OCE and Brillouin imaging analyses were conducted in the dermis layer, more specifically, near the top surface of the scaffold. The structural OCT images were used for qualitative visualization of the sample integrity, and only samples where the dermis layer was still intact with the membrane were included in the data analysis to mitigate the potential effect of membrane detachment on the estimated stiffness parameters. In all OCE experiments, the excitation focus point was co-aligned with the midpoint of the two orthogonal scans (i.e., B-scans in and planes) for each sample, as denoted by the yellow arrows in the top row of Figs. 3(a)–3(c), corresponding to CTL, -treated, and + galunisertib-treated skin samples, respectively. The middle row of Figs. 3(a)–3(c) displays snapshots of the wave motion, revealing noticeable differences in wavelength. The -treated sample, shown in Fig. 3(b), exhibited a relatively longer wavelength, whereas the control sample in Fig. 3(a) had the shortest wavelength. The last row of Fig. 3 presents representative spatial speed maps superimposed on OCT structural images. This speed map illustrates a relatively higher mean wave speed for the -treated skin scaffold compared with both the control and the + galunisertib-treated samples. In comparison, the -treated group exhibited a relatively higher wave speed (mean ± SD: ; ) than both the CTL (mean ± SD: ; ) and + galunisertib-treated (mean ± SD: ; ) groups. However, the difference between wave speeds of groups with and without AP was not significant (). On the other hand, the removal of AP appeared to result in a decrease in wave speed for both the CTL and + galunisertib-treated groups, potentially attributed to the fibrin gel degradation inhibitory effect of the AP. Figure 4 shows typical Brillouin frequency shift maps of each treatment condition of bio-engineered skin sample, indicating a relatively lower frequency shift for the CTL groups both with and without AP as plotted in Figs. 4(a) and 4(d), respectively. The average Brillouin frequency shift of CTL, , and + galunisertib with AP were , , and , whereas the average Brillouin frequency shift of CTL, , and + galunisertib without AP were , , and . The box-whisker plot in Fig. 5(a) illustrates the summary of wave speed distribution for the three groups of skin scaffold samples. In the plot, the box denotes the interquartile range, the median is represented by the horizontal line within the box, and mean values are depicted by small blue circles connected with a dashed line. The whiskers extend from the minimum to maximum values of the dataset. Table 1 shows a summary of pair-wise comparisons between different groups using the Mann-Whitney statistical test. Entries below the dashed zig-zag diagonal line correspond to results for OCE, whereas those above the line pertain to Brillouin microscopy frequency shift comparison. The table entries correspond to -values obtained by comparing the variables in the 2nd row and 2nd column of the corresponding entry. For example, the -treated group with AP showed a significantly higher wave speed compared to the CTL () and + galunisertib () groups with AP. The difference between the CTL and + galunisertib with () and without AP () was not significant. Table 1Pair-wise statistical analysis between groups.
Brillouin results are above the dashed diagonal zig-zag, and OCE results are below. The mean Brillouin frequency shift of every sample is plotted in the box-whisker plot in Fig. 5(b), showing the six-number boundary values of mean, median, minimum, maximum, first, and third quartiles. The trends of increasing and decreasing Brillouin frequency shift for and + galunisertib, respectively, agree with the changes in wave speed observed in OCE results without AP as shown in Fig. 5. However, there was no significant difference in the Brillouin frequency shift between CTL groups with and without AP (), in contrast to the notably lower wave speed () for the CTL group without AP as compared to that with AP. -values resulting from the Mann-Whitney test comparing the Brillouin frequency shift among different groups are presented above the dashed diagonal zig-zag line in Table 1. Results show that the Brillouin frequency shift of the -treated group was significantly higher than that of CTL, both with () and without AP (). Conversely, the effect of galunisertib was not statistically significant based on the comparison of Brillouin frequency shift between and + galunisertib, both with AP () and without it (), potentially implying the inhibitor’s successful dysregulation of . 4.Discussion and ConclusionsIn this study, we investigated the biomechanical properties of bio-engineered skin scaffolds, specifically examining the impact of , a signaling molecule involved in diverse cellular processes, including cell growth, differentiation, and immune response.46,47 Dysregulation of signaling has been implicated in the development and progression of certain diseases, such as cancer48,49 and fibrosis.50,51 To explore this aspect, we employed galunisertib, a receptor 1 inhibitor. Experimental investigation of evaluating the effects of both treatment and the inhibitor involved OCE and Brillouin microscopy to quantify biomechanical parameters, specifically elastic wave speed and Brillouin frequency shift, respectively. Both the elastic wave speed and Brillouin frequency shift, which are related to the inherent mechanical properties of tissue, were quantified for the dermis layer, as shown in Fig. 2(b). The OCE results, illustrated in Figs. 3 and 5(a) and Table 1, revealed significant differences (with AP, ; without AP, ) in wave speed between the control and -treated groups, with higher wave speed observed in the -treated group. Brillouin microscopy results, depicted in Figs. 4 and 5(b), complemented these findings, showing a consistent trend in Brillouin frequency shift aligned with OCE results. The increased wave speed may be attributed to ’s modulation of mechanical properties, primarily through its influence on both ECM and cellular components. For example, promotes the synthesis of various collagen types (e.g., types I and III), leading to elevated collagen deposition, which enhances the mechanical strength of the skin.52 Furthermore, influences fibroblasts, the cells involved in ECM production, triggering their conversion into highly contractile myofibroblasts.53 This transformation can impact the skin’s mechanical properties by influencing tension and contractility.54–56 Our study also showed that the receptor inhibitor galunisertib can effectively dysregulate the influence of as evidenced by a significantly lower wave speed (with AP, ; without AP, ) in + galunisertib-treated skin samples as compared with the -treated group. The Brillouin frequency shift in was not significantly greater than that of the + galunisertib-treated group (with AP, ; without AP, ). Similarly, the difference in the wave speed between the + galunisertib-treated and CTL groups was also not significant (with AP, ; without AP, ). However, the comparison of Brillouin shifts between CTL and + galunisertib showed a significantly higher frequency shift for + galunisertib as compared with that of CTL (with AP, ; without AP, ). This disparity in results between the two techniques may be explained by their sensitivity to different mechanical properties. The Brillouin frequency shift is linked to the longitudinal modulus,37 whereas elastic wave speed is associated with the shear modulus,30,35 and these two moduli are not directly comparable. Furthermore, the complex structure and potential mechanical anisotropy of the sample, governed by collagen fiber alignment, cellular arrangement, and ECM organization, could contribute to the weak correlation in the two moduli. For instance, inhibitor treatment may alter these structural elements of the scaffold, leading to varying impacts on longitudinal and shear moduli. Future research may explore how inhibitor treatment alters the scaffold’s structural elements and their relationship with the two mechanical moduli, making the proposed dual elastography approach essential for detailed and comprehensive biomechanical characterization. Differences in elastic wave speed and Brillouin frequency shift were observed between samples with and without the protease inhibitor (AP), potentially due to its effects on fibrin gel properties.40 Both CTL and + galunisertib samples exhibited a decreasing tendency in wave speed without AP. Similarly, Brillouin frequency shift was lower in TGF-B + galunisertib samples without AP than with AP, with no significant difference observed in CTL samples. These changes in wave speed and Brillouin frequency shift with AP may be attributed to AP’s role in maintaining function and controlling fibrin gel degradation.15 On the other hand, -treated samples (untreated with inhibitor) demonstrated a relative increase in both wave speed and Brillouin frequency shift, highlighting its impact on increasing scaffold stiffness. Generally, the results of the current study are in good agreement with previous research, which indicated a positive correlation between the tensile strength of skin and .57 This study provides valuable insights into the biomechanical changes induced by treatment and its inhibition in bio-engineered skin scaffolds. ACUS-OCE enables the noninvasive measurement of mechanical wave speed in near real-time. Physical tissue compliance descriptors, including shear modulus and viscosity, can be derived from wave propagation using appropriate elastic wave models that account for the thickness of the dermis layer and its boundary conditions.35 On the other hand, Brillouin microscopy offers a microscale and depth-resolved stiffness map derived from the Brillouin frequency shift, which correlates with the longitudinal modulus.37,38 OCE and Brillouin microscopy offer complementary insights by probing different frequency ranges of mechanical properties, high-frequency microscopic details from Brillouin, and low-frequency macroscopic properties from OCE, enabling a thorough multi-scale assessment of skin scaffold properties. Integrating both techniques confers a vital advantage for a comprehensive understanding of the role of in skin mechanics, thereby aiding in the formulation of targeted therapies for conditions involving aberrant tissue remodeling and fibrosis. Longitudinal studies and in vivo experiments can further validate and extend our findings, potentially advancing the translation of these techniques into clinical applications. Here, it is important to note that in the current study, the skin scaffold was inverted with the dermis facing the imaging optics and exposed to air, unlike in vivo where it is sandwiched between the epidermis and deeper tissues. The different acoustic impedance of air compared with tissue may affect the OCE wave speed measurements. Therefore, accurate estimation of mechanical properties, such as shear modulus, requires an appropriate analytical model that accounts for the dermis boundary conditions. DisclosuresMS, YA, and KVL have a financial interest in ElastEye LLC., which is not related to this work. AcknowledgmentsThis work was funded in parts by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (Grant Nos. R01EY033978, R01EY022362, R01EY030063, R61AR078078, and R01HD095520) and the NCATS Cure Acceleration Network program. ReferencesS. H. Hussain, B. Limthongkul and T. R. Humphreys,
“The biomechanical properties of the skin,”
Dermatol. Surg., 39
(2), 193
–203 https://doi.org/10.1111/dsu.12095
(2013).
Google Scholar
A. K. Langton et al.,
“Ageing significantly impacts the biomechanical function and structural composition of skin,”
Exp. Dermatol., 28
(8), 981
–984 https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.13980 EXDEEY 0906-6705
(2019).
Google Scholar
H. P. Dobrev,
“In vivo study of skin mechanical properties in patients with systemic sclerosis,”
J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 40
(3), 436
–442 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(99)70494-9 JAADDB 0190-9622
(1999).
Google Scholar
S. P. Zhong, Y. Z. Zhang and C. T. Lim,
“Tissue scaffolds for skin wound healing and dermal reconstruction,”
Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol., 2
(5), 510
–525 https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.100
(2010).
Google Scholar
S. Bottcher-Haberzeth, T. Biedermann and E. Reichmann,
“Tissue engineering of skin,”
Burns, 36
(4), 450
–460 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2009.08.016 BURND8 0305-4179
(2010).
Google Scholar
J. L. Grouf et al.,
“Differential effects of EGF and TGF-beta1 on fibroblast activity in fibrin-based tissue equivalents,”
Tissue Eng., 13
(4), 799
–807 https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.0206 1937-3341
(2007).
Google Scholar
M. R. Neidert et al.,
“Enhanced fibrin remodeling in vitro with TGF-beta1, insulin and plasmin for improved tissue-equivalents,”
Biomaterials, 23
(17), 3717
–3731 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00106-0 BIMADU 0142-9612
(2002).
Google Scholar
H. Oxlund and T. T. Andreassen,
“The roles of hyaluronic acid, collagen and elastin in the mechanical properties of connective tissues,”
J. Anat., 131
(Pt 4), 611
–620 JOANAY 0021-8782
(1980).
Google Scholar
J. J. Ross and R. T. Tranquillo,
“ECM gene expression correlates with in vitro tissue growth and development in fibrin gel remodeled by neonatal smooth muscle cells,”
Matrix Biol., 22
(6), 477
–490 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0945-053X(03)00078-7 MTBOEC 0945-053X
(2003).
Google Scholar
U. Kucich et al.,
“Transforming growth factor-beta stabilizes elastin mRNA by a pathway requiring active Smads, protein kinase c-delta, and p38,”
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., 26
(2), 183
–188 https://doi.org/10.1165/ajrcmb.26.2.4666 AJRBEL 1044-1549
(2002).
Google Scholar
H. Oxlund, J. Manschot and A. Viidik,
“The role of elastin in the mechanical properties of skin,”
J. Biomech., 21
(3), 213
–218 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(88)90172-8 JBMCB5 0021-9290
(1988).
Google Scholar
A. Aires et al.,
“Engineering multifunctional metal/protein hybrid nanomaterials as tools for therapeutic intervention and high-sensitivity detection,”
Chem. Sci., 12
(7), 2480
–2487 https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SC05215A 1478-6524
(2020).
Google Scholar
M. D. Davidson, J. A. Burdick and R. G. Wells,
“Engineered biomaterial platforms to study fibrosis,”
Adv. Healthc. Mater., 9
(8), e1901682 https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201901682
(2020).
Google Scholar
A. M. Porras et al.,
“Engineering approaches to study fibrosis in 3-D in vitro systems,”
Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 40 24
–30 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.006 CUOBE3 0958-1669
(2016).
Google Scholar
B. Hinz,
“Tissue stiffness, latent TGF-beta1 activation, and mechanical signal transduction: Implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of fibrosis,”
Curr. Rheumatol. Rep., 11
(2), 120
–126 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-009-0017-1
(2009).
Google Scholar
T. Quan et al.,
“Solar ultraviolet irradiation reduces collagen in photoaged human skin by blocking transforming growth factor-beta type II receptor/Smad signaling,”
Am. J. Pathol., 165
(3), 741
–751 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63337-8 AJPAA4 0002-9440
(2004).
Google Scholar
L. Wu et al.,
“Transforming growth factor-beta1 fails to stimulate wound healing and impairs its signal transduction in an aged ischemic ulcer model: importance of oxygen and age,”
Am. J. Pathol., 154
(1), 301
–309 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65276-5 AJPAA4 0002-9440
(1999).
Google Scholar
N. N. Do and S. A. Eming,
“Skin fibrosis: models and mechanisms,”
Curr. Res. Transl. Med., 64
(4), 185
–193 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retram.2016.06.003
(2016).
Google Scholar
Y. Ke and X. J. Wang,
“TGFβ signaling in photoaging and UV-induced skin cancer,”
J. Invest. Dermatol., 141
(4S), 1104
–1110 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2020.11.007 JIDEAE 0022-202X
(2021).
Google Scholar
J. Padmanabhan et al.,
“In vivo models for the study of fibrosis,”
Adv. Wound. Care, 8
(12), 645
–654 https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2018.0909
(2019).
Google Scholar
B. Dhandayuthapani et al.,
“Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: a review,”
Int. J. Polym. Sci., 2011 19 https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/290602
(2011).
Google Scholar
W. S. Toh, E. H. Lee and T. Cao,
“Potential of human embryonic stem cells in cartilage tissue engineering and regenerative medicine,”
Stem Cell Rev. Rep., 7
(3), 544
–559 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-010-9222-6
(2011).
Google Scholar
S. B. Seif-Naraghi et al.,
“Injectable extracellular matrix derived hydrogel provides a platform for enhanced retention and delivery of a heparin-binding growth factor,”
Acta Biomater., 8
(10), 3695
–3703 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.030
(2012).
Google Scholar
H. P. Lee et al.,
“Mechanical confinement regulates cartilage matrix formation by chondrocytes,”
Nat. Mater., 16
(12), 1243
–1251 https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4993 NMAACR 1476-1122
(2017).
Google Scholar
P. Agache and P. Humbert, Measuring the skin, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin
(2004). Google Scholar
T. Kang et al.,
“Skin imaging in systemic sclerosis,”
Eur. J. Rheumatol., 1
(3), 111
–116 https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjrheumatol.2014.036 EJRIDH 0140-1610
(2014).
Google Scholar
H. Liu et al.,
“A preliminary study of skin ultrasound in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: does skin echogenicity matter?,”
PLoS One, 12
(3), e0174481 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174481 POLNCL 1932-6203
(2017).
Google Scholar
A. Iagnocco et al.,
“Ultrasound elastography assessment of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis: lights and shadows,”
J. Rheumatol., 37
(8), 1688
–1691 https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.090974 JORHE3
(2010).
Google Scholar
B. F. Kennedy, P. Wijesinghe and D. D. Sampson,
“The emergence of optical elastography in biomedicine,”
Nat. Photonics, 11
(4), 215
–221 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2017.6 NPAHBY 1749-4885
(2017).
Google Scholar
X. Liang and S. A. Boppart,
“Biomechanical properties of in vivo human skin from dynamic optical coherence elastography,”
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 57
(4), 953
–959 https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2009.2033464 IEBEAX 0018-9294
(2010).
Google Scholar
X. Feng et al.,
“In vivo stiffness measurement of epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis using broadband Rayleigh-wave optical coherence elastography,”
Acta Biomater., 146 295
–305 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.04.030
(2022).
Google Scholar
L. Bartolini et al.,
“Toward clinical elastography of dermal tissues: a medical device to probe skin’s elasticity through suction, with subsurface imaging via optical coherence tomography,”
Rev. Sci. Instrum., 91
(7), 074101 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0009639 RSINAK 0034-6748
(2020).
Google Scholar
Y. Du et al.,
“Rapid, noninvasive quantitation of skin disease in systemic sclerosis using optical coherence elastography,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 21
(4), 046002 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.21.4.046002 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2016).
Google Scholar
C. H. Liu et al.,
“Translational optical coherence elastography for assessment of systemic sclerosis,”
J. Biophotonics, 12
(12), e201900236 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201900236
(2019).
Google Scholar
F. Zvietcovich and K. V. Larin,
“Wave-based optical coherence elastography: the 10-year perspective,”
Prog. Biomed. Eng., 4
(1), 012007 https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1091/ac4512
(2022).
Google Scholar
F. Zvietcovich et al.,
“Confocal air-coupled ultrasonic optical coherence elastography probe for quantitative biomechanics,”
Opt. Lett., 45
(23), 6567
–6570 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.410593 OPLEDP 0146-9592
(2020).
Google Scholar
R. Prevedel et al.,
“Brillouin microscopy: an emerging tool for mechanobiology,”
Nat. Methods, 16
(10), 969
–977 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0543-3 1548-7091
(2019).
Google Scholar
Y. S. Ambekar et al.,
“Multimodal quantitative optical elastography of the crystalline lens with optical coherence elastography and Brillouin microscopy,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 11
(4), 2041
–2051 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.387361 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2020).
Google Scholar
A. Nair et al.,
“Multimodal heartbeat and compression optical coherence elastography for mapping corneal biomechanics,”
Front. Med., 9 833597 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.833597
(2022).
Google Scholar
P. A. Janmey, J. P. Winer and J. W. Weisel,
“Fibrin gels and their clinical and bioengineering applications,”
J. R. Soc. Interface, 6
(30), 1
–10 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2008.0327 1742-5689
(2009).
Google Scholar
J. M. Yingling et al.,
“Preclinical assessment of galunisertib (LY2157299 monohydrate), a first-in-class transforming growth factor-beta receptor type I inhibitor,”
Oncotarget, 9
(6), 6659
–6677 https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23795
(2018).
Google Scholar
M. Singh, F. Zvietcovich and K. V. Larin,
“Introduction to optical coherence elastography: tutorial,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis., 39
(3), 418
–430 https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.444808
(2022).
Google Scholar
S. Song, Z. Huang and R. K. Wang,
“Tracking mechanical wave propagation within tissue using phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography: motion artifact and its compensation,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 18
(12), 121505 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.12.121505 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2013).
Google Scholar
M. A. Kirby et al.,
“Optical coherence elastography in ophthalmology,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 22
(12), 121720 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.22.12.121720 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2017).
Google Scholar
Y. S. Ambekar et al.,
“Multimodal imaging system combining optical coherence tomography and Brillouin microscopy for neural tube imaging,”
Opt. Lett., 47
(6), 1347
–1350 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.453996 OPLEDP 0146-9592
(2022).
Google Scholar
A. Moustakas et al.,
“Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling in regulation of cell growth and differentiation,”
Immunol. Lett., 82
(1–2), 85
–91 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2478(02)00023-8 IMLED6 0165-2478
(2002).
Google Scholar
J. J. Letterio and A. B. Roberts,
“Regulation of immune responses by TGF-beta,”
Annu. Rev. Immunol., 16 137
–161 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.16.1.137 ARIMDU 0732-0582
(1998).
Google Scholar
V. Syed,
“TGF-beta signaling in cancer,”
J. Cell Biochem., 117
(6), 1279
–1287 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.25496
(2016).
Google Scholar
J. Massague and D. Sheppard,
“TGF-beta signaling in health and disease,”
Cell, 186
(19), 4007
–4037 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.036 CELLB5 0092-8674
(2023).
Google Scholar
L. Raaf et al.,
“Myocardial fibrosis and TGFB expression in hyperhomocysteinemic rats,”
Mol. Cell Biochem., 347
(1–2), 63
–70 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-010-0612-5
(2011).
Google Scholar
J. L. Van Laethem et al.,
“Transforming growth factor beta promotes development of fibrosis after repeated courses of acute pancreatitis in mice,”
Gastroenterology, 110
(2), 576
–582 https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8566606 GASTAB 0016-5085
(1996).
Google Scholar
G. K. Reddy and C. S. Enwemeka,
“A simplified method for the analysis of hydroxyproline in biological tissues,”
Clin. Biochem., 29
(3), 225
–229 https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-9120(96)00003-6
(1996).
Google Scholar
B. Hinz,
“Formation and function of the myofibroblast during tissue repair,”
J. Invest. Dermatol., 127
(3), 526
–537 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jid.5700613 JIDEAE 0022-202X
(2007).
Google Scholar
B. Hinz et al.,
“The myofibroblast: one function, multiple origins,”
Am. J. Pathol., 170
(6), 1807
–1816 https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2007.070112 AJPAA4 0002-9440
(2007).
Google Scholar
P. J. Wipff et al.,
“Myofibroblast contraction activates latent TGF-beta1 from the extracellular matrix,”
J. Cell Biol., 179
(6), 1311
–1323 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200704042 JCLBA3 0021-9525
(2007).
Google Scholar
B. Hinz,
“Myofibroblasts,”
Exp. Eye Res., 142 56
–70 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2015.07.009 EXERA6 0014-4835
(2016).
Google Scholar
A. Widodo, P. S. Rahajoe and R. T. Astuti,
“TGF-beta expression and wound tensile strength after simple interrupted suturing and zip surgical skin closure (in vivo study),”
Ann. Med. Surg., 58 187
–193 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.08.009
(2020).
Google Scholar
BiographyTaye Tolu Mekonnen is currently a postdoctoral research associate at the University of Sydney, Australia. He received his PhD in biomedical engineering from Macquarie University in 2020. Furthermore, he completed his MSc degree in computer engineering at Addis Ababa University and a BSc degree in electrical engineering at Bahir Dar University, both in Ethiopia. Before commencing his PhD studies as a recipient of the international Macquarie University research training program (iMQRTP) scholarship, he embarked on his academic journey as a teaching assistant and later as a lecturer at Jimma University, Ethiopia. Following his PhD, he pursued postdoctoral research at the University of Houston, United States. His current research interest focuses on advancing and implementing high-resolution optical coherence tomography and optical coherence elastography imaging techniques in the fields of biomedical and pharmaceutical applications. Yogeshwari S. Ambekar received her BTech degree in electronics and telecommunications engineering from the Government College of Engineering Amravati, India, in 2014, and an MTech degree in biomedical engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, India, in 2018. She received her PhD in biomedical engineering from the University of Houston, Texas, United States, in 2022. She is currently working as a postdoctoral research associate in Dr. Giuliano Scarcelli’s lab in the Fischell Department of Bioengineering at the University of Maryland. Her research interests include optical coherence tomography (OCT) and elastography of biological tissues, Brillouin microscopy, multimodal OCT-Brillouin imaging, and image processing. Christian Zevallos-Delgado is a biomedical engineering PhD student at the University of Houston. He received his MSc degree in bioinformatics and molecular biochemistry from George Washington University in 2020 and his BEng in biotechnology from the Catholic University of Santa María, Arequipa, Peru, in 2016. His research interest involves the assessment of biomechanical properties in developmental biology using mice and zebrafish utilizing optical coherence elastography. Achuth Nair is a postdoctoral fellow at the Biomedical Optics Laboratory at the University of Houston. After receiving his PhD in biomedical engineering from the University of Houston in 2022, he was awarded a National Library of Medicine Data Science and Biomedical Informatics Training Fellowship. His research interests include developing novel methods of noninvasive tissue biomechanical characterization, optical tools for disease diagnosis, and biomedical applications of artificial intelligence. Fernando Zvietcovich is a research professor in the Department of Engineering at Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru (PUCP) located in Lima, Peru. He is also the director of the Biophotonics and Biomedical Optics Research Group at the same institution. He obtained his BSc and MSc degrees in the Electrical Engineering Department at PUCP in Lima, Peru, in 2012 and 2014, respectively. He also earned his PhD in electrical and computer engineering from the Electrical Engineering Department at the University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States, in 2019. Since then, he worked as a postdoc and research associate at the University of Houston, Houston, Texas, and the Spanish Nacional Research Council in Madrid, Spain. He was awarded the Fulbright Scholarship to study abroad in 2014 and the MIT Technology Review Innovator Under 35 in the same year. He also was the winner of prestigious fellowships for conducting his research activities in optical coherence elastography including the SPIE Franz-Hillenkamp Fellowship (2020), the Optical Foundation Challenge (2023), and the Wellcome Trust Early-Career Award (2024). Hoda Zarkoob the LDO High Content Screening Team at Bristol Meyers Squibb in April 2023, specializing in developing advanced in vitro models for screening. Previously, she worked as a biomedical scientist in the 3D Tissue Bioprinting team at NCATS/NIH, led by Dr. Marc Ferrer. There, she focused on creating immune-competed 3D skin disease models for high-throughput screening. Hoda holds BSc and MSc degrees in mechanical engineering from Isfahan University of Technology, along with a PhD in biomedical engineering from the University of Iowa. She furthered her research as a postdoctoral fellow in the laboratory of Kathleen J. Green, PhD, at Northwestern University. During her fellowship, she studied the mechanobiology of cell-cell junctions in cardiocutaneous disease and earned a fellowship through the American Heart Association. Manmohan Singh received his BSc degree in biomedical engineering from the University of Houston in 2014 and his PhD in biomedical engineering from the University of Houston in 2018. Following his PhD, he completed a fellowship sponsored by the National Library of Medicine in data science and biomedical informatics from the Gulf Coast Consortia of Quantitative Biomedical Sciences. He is now a research assistant professor at the University of Houston, and his research interests are focused on developing innovative functional imaging modalities for the multimodal characterization of tissues completely noninvasively and associated with artificial intelligence algorithms to fuse the multimodal data and improve disease detection performance. Yi Wei Lim received a BSc degree in biomedical sciences from Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, in 2013. In 2021, she received a PhD in molecular biology, with a focus in immunology from Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois. She is currently an IRTA Postdoctoral Fellow at the 3D Tissue Bioprinting Lab at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), Rockville, Maryland. Her research interests include the development of immunocompetent 3D tissue models for disease modeling and drug screening. Her awards and honors include Excellence in Research Award (Marquette University), NIH/NIAAA T32 training grant in “Training in Neuroimmunoendocrine Effects of Alcohol” (Loyola University Chicago), and Autoimmune Research Disease Fellowship (Office of Autoimmune Diseases Research, NIH). Marc Ferrer received his BSc degree in organic chemistry from the University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, in 1989, and his PhD in chemistry from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States, in 1994. He is currently the director of the 3D Tissue Bioprinting Laboratory at the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS). From 1999 to 2010, he was at the Automated Biotechnology Department at Merck Research Laboratories developing assays and implementing high throughput screens for Merck’s drug discovery programs. Since 2010, he has been at the NIH, where he was first a team leader in the Probe Discovery Program to develop tool compounds to investigate molecular mechanisms underlying diseases, and later established the 3D Tissue Bioprinting Laboratory to develop tissue models as predictive assay platforms for drug discovery and development. His research interest focuses on developing translational platforms to accelerate the development of therapeutics. Salavat R. Aglyamov is a research associate professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Houston. He completed his BSc and MSc degrees in applied mathematics from Moscow State University, Russia, in 1991 and 1993, respectively. He earned his PhD in biophysics from the Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics, Russia, in 1999. Between 2001 and 2002, he was a postdoctoral fellow at the Biomedical Ultrasonics Lab at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. He continued his research as a postdoctoral fellow and research scientist in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin from 2002 until 2017. In 2017, he joined the research faculty at the University of Houston. His research focuses on tissue biomechanics, elasticity imaging, medical imaging, ultrasound, optics, and photoacoustics. Giuliano Scarcelli is an associate professor at the University of Maryland in the Bioengineering Department and the Biophysics program. Giuliano obtained his PhD in physics with an EU-funded fellowship between the University of Bari, Italy, and UMBC, United States, then was at the Wellman Center for Photomedicine of Harvard Medical School for eight years, first as a postdoc in Prof. Yun’s Lab, then as an instructor and assistant professor. He joined the University of Maryland in 2015. Giuliano has been the recipient of several awards such as the “Exceptional by Example” award for outstanding PhD studies, the Tosteson Postdoctoral Fellowship at Harvard, the Human Frontier Science Program Young Investigator Award, the NIH Quantitative Career Award, the NSF CAREER award, and “Teaching excellence” awards from both Harvard University and the University of Maryland. Min Jae Song received his MSc degree in mechanical engineering from Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States, in 2008 and his PhD in biomedical engineering from Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States, in 2012. From 2016 to 2018, he was a research fellow at the National Eye Institute, NIH. Since 2019, he has been a staff scientist at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH, Rockville, Maryland, United States. His research interest includes engineering 3D multicellular models and disease modeling in high-throughput (HT) platforms for drug discovery and development and HT assay development by translating tissue engineering tools. Kirill V. Larin is a Cullen-endowed chair and professor of biomedical engineering at the University of Houston. He received his MS degree in laser physics and mathematics from the Saratov State University (1995) and PhD in biomedical engineering from the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston (2002). He has published more than 200 papers in the field of biomedical optics and biophotonics. He is a fellow of SPIE, OPTICA, and AIMBE. |
Skin
Biomechanics
Elastography
Tissues
Microscopy
Elasticity
Tissue optics