PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
Spatio-temporal variability in clinical fluoroscopy and cine angiography images combined with nonlinear image processing prevents the application of traditional image quality measurements in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. We aimed to develop and validate methods to measure human observer impressions of the image quality.
Approach
Multi-frame images of the thorax of a euthanized pig were acquired to provide an anatomical background. The detector dose was varied from 6 to 200 nGy (increments 2×), and 0.6 and 1.0 mm focal spots were used. Two coronary stents with/without 0.5 mm separation and a synthetic right coronary artery (RCA) with hemispherical defects were embedded into the background images as test objects. The quantitative observer (n=17) performance was measured using a two-alternating forced-choice test of whether stents were separated and by a count of visible right coronary artery defects. Qualitative impressions of noise, spatial resolution, and overall image quality were measured using a visual analog scale (VAS). A paired t-test and multinomial logistic regression model were used to identify statistically significant factors affecting the observer’s impression image quality.
Results
The proportion of correct detection of stent separation and the number of reported right coronary artery defects changed significantly with detector dose increment in the 6 to 100 nGy (p<0.05). Although a trend favored the 0.6 versus 1.0 mm focal spot for these quantitative assessments, this was insignificant. Visual analog scale measurements changed significantly with detector dose increments in the range of 24 to 100 nGy and focal spot size (p<0.05). The application of multinomial logistic regression analysis to observer VAS scores demonstrated sensitivity matching of the paired t-test applied to quantitative observer performance measurements.
Conclusions
Both quantitative and qualitative measurements of observer impression of the image quality were sensitive to image quality changes associated with changing the detector dose and focal spot size. These findings encourage future work that uses qualitative image quality measurements to assess clinical fluoroscopy and angiography image quality.
Jelena M. Mihailovic,Yoshihisa Kanaji,Daniel Miller,Malcolm R. Bell, andKenneth A. Fetterly
"Comparison of human observer impression of X-ray fluoroscopy and angiography image quality with technical changes to image quality," Journal of Medical Imaging 11(4), 045502 (10 August 2024). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.11.4.045502
Received: 26 February 2024; Accepted: 15 July 2024; Published: 10 August 2024
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Jelena M. Mihailovic, Yoshihisa Kanaji, Daniel Miller, Malcolm R. Bell, Kenneth A. Fetterly, "Comparison of human observer impression of X-ray fluoroscopy and angiography image quality with technical changes to image quality," J. Med. Imag. 11(4) 045502 (10 August 2024) https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.11.4.045502