We have designed a silicon detector based on an avalanche photodiode for detecting vacuum ultraviolet radiation. It was demonstrated that the detector has a photon detection efficiency superior to 0.65 electrons / photon, in the wavelength range from 114 to 170 nm, with an external quantum yield from 49 to 7000 electrons / photon at a reverse-bias voltage from 190 to 315 V, respectively. The detector’s active area diameter is 1.5 mm. |
1.IntroductionCurrently, the development of the detectors, which effectively detect vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) is relevant for solving a wide range of scientific problems in the physics of high-temperature plasma, detecting synchrotron radiation, and studying dark matter.1,2 This paper is mainly focused on the spectral parameter, which is the most difficult in terms of recording with solid-state detectors. This is the hydrogen Lyman- emission line at 121.6 nm, having an absorption depth of around 10 nm for each metal, each semiconductor and more than each second dielectric.3 One of the main parameters, characterizing the detector, is a photon detection efficiency (). For non-avalanche silicon photodiodes, the value of was around at a wavelength of 160 nm, as demonstrated previously.4 Recently, with regard to the same kind of photodiodes, the achieved value of was reported to be at the level of 1.3 to 1.5 electrons/photon within the 206- to 168-nm spectral range, respectively.5 This paper considers a solid-state avalanche detector design and characteristics. The task of designing a detector with an internal gain and with a photon detection efficiency () superior to in the full spectrum of VUV radiation, has yet to be achieved. Our previous paper6 presented an avalanche silicon precision detector (ASPD). This paper showed that (ASPD photon detection efficiency) in the 120- to 170-nm spectral range, was around . This value is not a stellar result, compared to the corresponding values of the large area avalanche detectors (LAAPD) presented in Ref. 7. The improved ASPD, designed and studied to increase the , will be reported upon here. 2.Improved ASPDAs already established, there are two dominant loss factors responsible for the value of in a semiconductor detector. These losses are due to the reflection of light, detected in the detector’s active area and the collection of losses of photoinduced carriers within the area. It is notable that in the case of the full spectrum of VUV light, the dielectric, anti-reflection coatings method is unacceptable, since most dielectrics actively absorb VUV light at wavelengths of ,3,6 which will inevitably lead to a decrease in . The previous ASPD6 was a silicon, reach-through, avalanche photodiode. This ASPD was made on a float zone, with [100] orientation from an 8 to 10 kohm-cm silicon material, with a thickness of -region . The VUV was detected in a back-illuminated mode at normal photon incidence on the flat surface of the isotype junction. In the case of the ASPD presented, a well-known method of texturing the silicon detector’s active area was applied to reduce the reflection losses. Using this method, a pyramid, with a height of around and apex angles of 54.7 deg could be formed on the silicon surface. A special effort was made to minimize the depth of the isotype junction to reduce any losses associated with the efficiency of collecting photoinduced carriers in the near-surface ASPD active area. The dark current was reduced by halving the region of the improved ASPD, to a value of around . To carry out further research, the metrological base and techniques described in Ref. 6 were used. Figure 1 shows the difference between the structures of the previous ASPD version6 and an improved version, ASPD irradiation modes, as well as the difference between the wavelengths used in Ref. 6 and in this paper. To exclude thermal influence while taking measurements, the ASPD’s TO-5 package was used, with a high thermal contact to an aluminum thermal capacitor of . Considering the amount of power saturation at the ASPD’s active area, this would give a stability rate better than 0.49 K per hour. Figure 2 shows the improved ASPD photographs. Fig. 1ASPD structures: (a) study;1 (b) this study; 1 – aluminum layer, 2 – layer, 3 – region, 4 – multiplication layer, 5 – layer, 6 – silicon dioxide layer, 7 – aluminum layer, 8 – silicon nitride layer. ![]() 3.ASPD Multiplication FactorThe (ASPD multiplication factor) value was found to determine . The first series of experiments were at determining the . To achieve this, we measured the external quantum yield () of two improved ASPDs in a front-illuminated mode [Fig. 2(a)] at a wavelength of , therefore, the layer (Fig. 1) was irradiated. In relation to these measurements, the front-illuminated mode was chosen because it provides more reliable information regarding the thicknesses and composition of the ASPD layers, from the side of the layer. was chosen as it is convenient for estimating radiation absorption in the ASPD structure. There are two reasons for choosing to determine in the front-illuminated mode. The first is that estimating the reflection losses is possible at , as the surface structure on the layer is better known from the perspective of manufacturing technology. To estimate the reflection losses,8 we took into account the fact that the silicon nitride is 135-nm thick on the layer surface. At normal-incidence radiation, the reflection losses amount to around 5% for . The second reason is that the absorption depth in silicon is approximately .3 Given that 135-nm thick is transparent for , it can be argued that the absorption losses in silicon nitride are zero. Considering that the silicon layer is not thicker than , and radiation absorption depth is around , the radiation losses in the layer can also be disregarded. As the base thickness of the studied ASPD is , it is correct to assert that all unreflected radiation for will be absorbed in the region of the ASPD and then gained in the multiplication zone. The region width is much greater than the absorption depth , therefore, we further assumed that 95% of the radiation at , would be absorbed by the region of the ASPDs being studied. This test was carried out using two ASPDs under a reverse-bias voltage of 220 V in the open air at 23°C. The measurements were carried out by comparing the photocurrents flowing through the studied ASPDs and through the silicon precision detector (SPD), calibrated9 in terms of sensitivity. The external quantum yield of an ASPD was determined: where is the measured photocurrent through an ASPD; is the measured photocurrent through the calibrated photodiode and is the external quantum yield of the calibrated photodiode.The multiplication factor of an ASPD was determined: where is the calculated external quantum yield of an ASPD and 0.95 is the unreflected radiation factor for .Table 1 shows the results for both measuring the external quantum yield () for two ASPD samples and calculating the at under a reverse-bias voltage of 220 V. Table 1External quantum yield and multiplication factor for the two ASPDs.
3.1.Photon Detection EfficiencyThe goal of this experiment was to determine . The photocurrent was measured in the 114- to 170-nm spectral range in samples, with the determined for a reverse-bias voltage of 220 V, in the back-illuminated mode [Fig. 2(b), irradiated layer] at 23°C. The ASPD photon detection efficiency was determined: where is the external quantum yield of the calibrated photodiode; is the measured photocurrent through the ASPD; is the measured photocurrent through the calibrated photodiode and is the multiplication factor of an ASPD, calculated as above. Figure 3 shows our calculation results and the results from Refs. 6 and 7.3.2.Dark Current and External Quantum Yield at 116 nmThroughout the final stage, we determined the prospects for using the improved ASPD. The dark current and for sample 9 at 23°C are shown in Fig. 4. 4.DiscussionWe investigated experimentally the silicon VUV avalanche detector properties. The improved ASPD proposed, is a combination of a textured surface with a isotype junction on the reverse side of the silicon avalanche photodiode base, with an active area diameter of 1.5 mm. The reduction in reflection losses, due to texturing, provided an increase in , without the use of dielectric coatings. This made it possible to obtain a quasi-constant value in the 114- to 170-nm spectral range, which was an improvement on the detectors presented in Refs. 6 and 7, and was more than five times higher than that recorded using the first ASPD.6 A set of quasi-constant spectral dependences and superior to , is very convenient from a metrological point of view. may indicate that increasing the effective detector dead layer is essential, due to an abnormal VUV incidence angle in the case of a textured active area surface. ASPDs have an active region structure formed by the same method as in SPDs, i.e., with a dead layer thickness of around 8 nm.10 Hence, the possibility of using an ASPD in the full spectrum of VUV radiation should be expected, and not only when measuring its studied element in the 114–170-nm spectral range, which is the most difficult from a VUV detection point of view.6 This expectation is based on the spectral dependence of on such a calibrated SPD photodiode9,11,12 [Fig. 5(a)], which has a textured active region with a layer. As can be seen from Fig. 5(a), in the case of a calibrated SPD and an improved ASPD, we can consider the correlation of their spectral dependences, i.e., the , with the spectral dependences of the absorption depths of ultraviolet photons in boron13 and silicon.3 An increase in the values of the calibrated SPD for wavelengths , is associated with a significant increase in the absorption depth in silicon, as well as an increase in the contribution of the impact ionization effect in silicon, due to an increase in the energy of the quanta being detected.14 It should be noted that the active region of the layer, used in these detectors, can be characterized as a solid solution of boron and silicon, coated with an amorphous boron silicide layer thick.10 The lower value in relation to the calibrated SPD (relative to the improved ASPD) is associated with the increased collection losses of photoinduced carriers within the active area. These losses are due to the greater junction depth and the higher dead layer thickness in the case of the calibrated SPD, than in the isotype junction of the improved ASPD structure. Fig. 5Spectral dependences of the ultraviolet quanta absorption depth and the photon detection efficiency. ![]() In the case of LAAPD,7 as the wavelength decreases from 175 to 128 nm, a twofold decrease in the value of is observed [Fig. 5(b)]. This decrease is most likely associated with an increase in absorption in the dielectric coating of the active region. The interference factor should not be ruled out, as can be seen in Ref. 4 using as an example. In the case of improved ASPD, interference is not a first-order factor, due to the limited thickness of the amorphous layer (no more than 8 nm). In addition, the spectral dependences of the ultraviolet quanta absorption depth in silicon and boron [Fig. 5(a)], do not demonstrate sharp decreases in values in the range of 50 to 250 nm, by contrast with the similar characteristics of dielectrics [Fig. 5(b)]. We could not find any data on the ultraviolet quanta absorption depth for boron silicides in the referenced literature. Figure 5(b) shows the spectral dependences of for non-avalanche silicon photodiodes, made using black-silicon (b-Si) technology15 and well-known, non-avalanche AXUV photodiodes.16 The data for b-Si and AXUV photodiodes were taken from Ref. 5. As one can see from the referenced literature, the active region of b-Si photodiodes is covered with a 20-nm thick layer15 and the AXUV active region is covered with a 4- to 8-nm thick nitrided layer.16 Figure 5(b) also demonstrates the spectral dependences of the ultraviolet quanta absorption depth for 3 and for .17 As can be seen from Fig. 5(b), the spectral dependence of in the case of AXUV exhibits a pronounced dip at a wavelength of , which correlates with the local minimum of the absorption depth of VUV quanta for . It follows from this that the nitrided , used in AXUV, is similar in terms of its optical properties to . There is every reason to believe that the decrease in AXUV by in the region of 121 nm, is associated with a sharp increase in losses in the active region of AXUV, due to VUV absorption in the nitrided . A similar effect should be expected in the case of b-Si photodiodes. A decrease in the value of for b-Si photodiodes by tens of percent, will be due to an increase in the loss of VUV quanta as a result of the absorption in the layer in relation to wavelengths less than 130 nm. Moreover, b-Si photodiodes will exhibit higher losses due to the greater thickness of than that of nitrided , in the case of AXUV. The presence of nanotexture15 will be an additional negative factor that increases the loss of VUV radiation in for b-Si photodiodes. Nanotexture forms an angle of radiation incidence on the surface of . The effective thickness of the layer will be more than 20 nm for the radiation incidence, usually associated with the active region of the b-Si photodiodes. It should be noted that in addition to the aforementioned significant parameter, , there are other equally important properties of photodiodes, for example, the resistance of their active region to ozone cleaning of the surface from carbon contamination,18 as well as the resistance of the photodiodes’ active region to VUV radiation.4,16,19 VUV radiation induces an additional positive charge in the irradiated zone of the photodiode active region, changing the initial surface charge. A change in the surface charge of the active region of the detecting zone of the photodiode, leads to a change in the losses associated with the collection of minority charge carriers. As a result, changing these losses decreases or increases the value of . A change in at the primary stage can lead to an increase in its value,4 but ultimately leads to its decrease and degradation of the photodiode.4,20,21 In light of the above, it would be extremely interesting to obtain the results of the radiation hardness tests for b-Si photodiodes at wavelengths of 121.6 and 193 nm. The measurements were carried out by direct comparison with an absolutely calibrated photodiode using a gas-discharge lamp and a monochromator. This resulted in fewer errors than in Ref. 7. The measurement error was determined by the calibration9 accuracy of the reference SPD photodiode (3% to 6%) at all wavelengths, except for , where a low flux density from a gas-discharge lamp was detected by a calibrated photodiode, with an accuracy of 10%. It should be noted that despite the high ASPD external quantum yield, AXUV detectors16 or SPDs are more suitable for VUV absolute measurements. In these detectors, there is no temperature-dependent avalanche multiplication of photoinduced carriers. In addition, the silicon detectors, based on avalanche multiplication, are limited by the maximum photocurrent of (for ), due to the danger of irreversible thermal breakdown. There is no such limitation for detectors without avalanche multiplication. Nevertheless, detectors with an internal gain, make it possible to solve the problems of recording the dynamics of VUV radiation, with a flux density 100 or more times lower than detectors without an internal gain. 5.ConclusionThis paper has presented a new silicon detector for VUV radiation detection, with a photon detection efficiency superior to in the full 114- to 170-nm spectral range; this detector operates at modes with an external quantum yield between 49 and at a reverse-bias voltage from 190 to 315 V, respectively. Further investigations will be aimed at studying the temperature dependences of the photon detection efficiency in the VUV range, as well as the noise characteristics of the presented avalanche photodiode. AcknowledgmentsWe are grateful to our colleagues from the Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, namely N.V. Zabrodskaya, M.S. Lazeeva, M.V. Drozdova, and V. I. Marshalova, for their help in preparing photodiodes, and we would like to thank M.E. Levinshtein for reading the manuscripts and making valuable remarks. ReferencesP. Agnes et al.,
“Direct search for dark matter with DarkSide,”
J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 650 012006
(2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/650/1/012006 JPCSDZ 1742-6588 Google Scholar
W. Zheng, L. Jia and F. Huang,
“Vacuum-ultraviolet photon detections,”
iScience, 23
(6), 101145
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101145 Google Scholar
E. D. Palik, Handbooks of Optical Constants of Solids, 1 Academic Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
(1998). Google Scholar
L. R. Canfield et al.,
“Absolute silicon photodiodes for 160 nm to 254 nm photons,”
Metrologia, 35 329
–334
(1998). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/35/4/19 MTRGAU 0026-1394 Google Scholar
T. Tsang et al.,
“Quantum efficiency of black silicon photodiodes at VUV wavelengths,”
Opt. Express, 28 13299
–13309
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.385448 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
P. N. Aruev et al.,
“Quantum yield of a silicon avalanche photodiode in the wavelength range of 120–170 nm,”
Tech. Phys., 65
(8), 1333
–1339
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063784220080022 TEPHEX 1063-7842 Google Scholar
L. R. Chandrasekharan, M. Messina and A. Rubbia,
“Detection of noble gas scintillation light with large area avalanche photodiodes (LAAPDs),”
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A, 567
(1), 45
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2006.05.058 Google Scholar
M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, 7th ed.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
(1999). Google Scholar
A. Gottwald et al.,
“Ultraviolet and vacuum-ultraviolet detector-based radiometry at the Metrology Light Source,”
Meas. Sci. Technol., 21 125101
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/21/12/125101 MSTCEP 0957-0233 Google Scholar
V. Zabrodskii et al,
“SiPM prototype for direct VUV registration,”
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A, 787 348
(2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2015.01.070 Google Scholar
F. Scholze, R. Klein and R. Müller,
“Characterization of detectors for extreme UV radiation,”
Metrologia, 43 S6
–S10
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/43/2/S02 MTRGAU 0026-1394 Google Scholar
P. N. Aruev et al.,
“The architecture of a hybrid matrix format high-speed detector for spectral range vacuum ultraviolet–hard x-rays,”
Instrum. Exp. Tech., 64
(1), 93
–96
(2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020441220060147 INETAK 0020-4412 Google Scholar
M. Fernández-Perea et al,
“Optical constants of electron-beam evaporated boron films in the 6.8-900 eV photon energy range,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 24 3800
–3807
(2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.24.003800 JOAOD6 0740-3232 Google Scholar
S. Kolodinski et al.,
“Quantum efficiencies exceeding unity due to impact ionization in silicon solar cells,”
Appl Phys Lett, 63 2405
(1993). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.110489 Google Scholar
M. Garin et al.,
“Black-silicon ultraviolet photodiodes achieve external quantum efficiency above 130%,”
Phys. Rev. Lett., 125 117702
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.117702 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar
R. Korde, J. S. Cable and L. R. Canfield,
“One gigarad passivating nitrided oxides for 100% internal quantum efficiency silicon photodiodes,”
IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 40 1655
(1993). https://doi.org/10.1109/23.273555 IETNAE 0018-9499 Google Scholar
R. H. French, H. Mullejans and D. J. Jones,
“Optical properties of aluminum oxide: determined from vacuum ultraviolet and electron energy‐loss spectroscopies,”
J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 81
(10), 2549
–2557
(1998). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02660.x JACTAW 0002-7820 Google Scholar
F. Scholze, R. Klein and T. Bock,
“Irradiation stability of silicon photodiodes for extreme-ultraviolet radiation,”
Appl. Opt., 42
(28), 5621
(2003). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.005621 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar
V.V. Zabrodsky et al.,
“A study of vacuum ultraviolet stability of silicon photodiodes,”
Tech. Phys. Lett., 38
(9), 812
–815
(2012). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063785012090143 TPLEED 1063-7850 Google Scholar
P. N. Aruev et al.,
“Characterization of spatial homogeneity of sensitivity and radiation resistance of semiconductor detectors in the soft x-ray range,”
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 603 58
–61
(2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2008.12.159 Google Scholar
V. V. Zabrodsky et al.,
“Study of EUV and x-ray radiation hardness of silicon photodiodes,”
Proc. SPIE, 8777 87770R
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2017478 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar
|