Sensors are relied upon to represent the physical state of autonomous systems that are controlled by AI. Accurate data from these sensors is required to avoid collisions and catastrophic events in actual situations. Redundant sensors are often used in mission critical sensors to mitigate both unexpected failures and cyberattacks. Redundant sensors double or triple the sensor system cost without giving the user information about which sensor is faulty in real-time.
We developed a method that exploits small sensor-to-sensor variations; thereby fingerprinting them. For this purpose, we designed circuitry measuring a TMCS1101A4 magnetic current sensor pair. The small differences between the two sensors and the measurement of the calibrated sensor are amplified and recorded in a database as the current sensed is varied over a range from 0 to 320 mA. Future measurements of the sensor pair may be compared to the stored table in real-time to check sensor accuracy.
Sensor failure can be modeled by placing the output of one sensor in an open-circuit condition. Measurements then specify the percentage accuracy that is maintained in real-time without the sensor reporting a fault.
Additionally, arrays of sensors are used to generate unique system identifiers that verify the authenticity of the source of the data. These identifiers are not fixed but can be regenerated by a challenge from the server making it more difficult for actors to falsify the sensor data. Larger arrays of sensors will be investigated to generate encryption keys and seeds for Post Quantum Cryptography (PQC).
Real-time collection of reliable sensor information for the computing elements of Autonomous Systems (ASs) is crucial for execution of tasks that protect human lives and strategic assets. Both Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), and the Internet of Things (IoT), heavily rely on dependable sensor data to perform their functions. We propose the utilization of a sensor-based Physically Unclonable Function (PUF) to detect the health of the sensor itself; without imposing restrictions on its potential application for cryptographic authentication, identification and key generation in future endeavors. Two key considerations are emphasized: (1) in the absence of sensor malfunction, predictable responses are anticipated and (2) if the sensor is malfunctioning then there should be a noticeable shift in the responses; indicating the need for replacement or the disregard of sensor data information (which may prevent an unintended outcome that may otherwise occur). We conduct an examination of both intra and inter aspects of the accelerometer-PUF. Furthermore, a dedicated section is included to present the outcomes of health detection based on the sensor pairs’ responses. Additionally, we perform temperature testing to measure the reproducibility of the PUF under varying conditions; encompassing both cold and hot temperatures over the range −20°C < T > 50°C.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.