Epicardial Adipose Tissue (EAT) volume has been associated with risk of cardiovascular events, but manual annotation is time-consuming and only performed on gated Computed Tomography (CT). We developed a Deep Learning (DL) model to segment EAT from gated and ungated CT, then evaluated the association between EAT volume and death or Myocardial Infarction (MI). We included 7712 patients from three sites, two with ungated CT and one using gated CT. Of those, 500 patients from one site with ungated CT were used for model training and validation and 3,701 patients from the remaining two sites were used for external testing. Threshold for abnormal EAT volume (⪆144mL) was derived in the internal population based on Youden’s index. DL EAT measurements were obtained in ⪅2 seconds compared to approximately 15 minutes for expert annotations. Excellent Spearman correlation between DL and expert reader on an external subset of N=100 gated (0.94, p⪅0.001) and N=100 ungated (0.91, p⪅0.001). During median follow-up of 3.1 years (IQR 2.1 – 4.0), 306(8.3%) patients experienced death or MI in the external testing populations. Elevated EAT volume was associated with an increased risk of death or MI for gated (hazard ratio [HR] 1.72, 95% CI 1.11-2.67) and ungated CT (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.20 – 2.07), with no significant difference in risk (interaction p-value 0.692). EAT volume measurements provide similar risk stratification from gated and ungated CT. These measurements could be obtained on chest CT performed for a large variety of indications, potentially improving risk stratification.
We aimed to develop a novel deep-learning based method for automatic coronary artery calcium (CAC) quantification in low-dose ungated computed tomography attenuation correction maps (CTAC). In this study, we used convolutional long-short -term memory deep neural network (conv-LSTM) to automatically derive coronary artery calcium score (CAC) from both standard CAC scans and low-dose ungated scans (CT-attenuation correction maps). We trained convLSTM to segment CAC using 9543 scans. A U-Net model was trained as a reference method. Both models were validated in the OrCaCs dataset (n=32) and in the held-out cohort (n=507) without prior coronary interventions who had CTAC standard CAC scan acquired contemporarily. Cohen’s kappa coefficients and concordance matrices were used to assess agreement in four CAC score categories (very low: <10, low:10-100; moderate:101-400 and high <400). The median time to derive results on a central processing unit (CPU) was significantly shorter for the conv-LSTM model- 6.18s (inter quartile range [IQR]: 5.99, 6.3) than for UNet (10.1s, IQR: 9.82, 15.9s, p<0.0001). The memory consumption during training was much lower for our model (13.11Gb) in comparison with UNet (22.31 Gb). Conv-LSTM performed comparably to UNet in terms of agreement with expert annotations, but with significantly shorter inference times and lower memory consumption
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.