Dr. Michiel Dehairs Profile

Dr. Michiel Dehairs

at Institut Jules Bordet

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (1)

This will count as one of your downloads.

You will have access to both the presentation and article (if available).

DOWNLOAD NOW

This content is available for download via your institution's subscription. To access this item, please sign in to your personal account.

Email or Username Forgot your username?

Password Forgot your password?

Show

Keep me signed in

No SPIE account? Create an account

Proceedings Article | 4 April 2022 Presentation + Paper

Impact of a high aspect ratio antiscatter grid for coronary angiography imaging on imaging system dose efficiency

Nicholas Marshall, Michiel Dehairs, Hannelore Verhoeven, Hilde Bosmans

Proceedings Volume 12031, 1203105 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2613036

KEYWORDS: Imaging systems, Modulation transfer functions, Angiography, X-rays, Spatial frequencies, Signal to noise ratio, X-ray imaging, Receptors, Iron, Composites

Read Abstract +

Aim: To evaluate the impact of a high ratio antiscatter grid on imaging system dose efficiency using a spatial frequency domain figure of merit, for coronary angiography applications. Methods: Four imaging conditions were assessed: a source-image receptor distance (SID) of 105cm, used with and without the standard 15/80 grid, and an SID of 120cm used with and without the new 29/80 grid. Automatic dose rate control (ADRC) x-ray factors were generated for these conditions and used to image a composite phantom, with each slab made of 20 mm poly(methyl)methacrylate (PMMA), 2 mm Al and 7 mm expanded polystyrene. Total phantom thickness ranged from 9 cm to 44 cm. An Fe square was included in the phantom and imaged at the iso-centre. Signal difference to noise ratio (SDNR) was measured and multiplied by modulation transfer function (MTF) based weighting factors to give SDNR(u), along with additional factors to account for the influence of SID and DQE. A figure of merit (FOM) defined as SDNR²(u)/K was used to compare the four conditions, where K is the air kerma at the interventional reference point. Results: Below phantom thicknesses of ~20 cm, neither grid improved system dose efficiency compared to imaging without grid. For thicknesses of 30 cm up to 44 cm, dose reduction using the 29/80 grid compared to the 15/80 grid ranged from 10% to 48%. Conclusion: Evaluation using the SDNR²(u) based FOM showed that the 29/80 grid reduced dose by up to 48% compared to the current 15/80 grid, for phantom thicknesses above 24 cm.

My Library

You currently do not have any folders to save your paper to! Create a new folder below.

Folder Name

Folder Description

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks. You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*

*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please sign in to access your institution's subscriptions.

To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on SPIE.org.

ORGANIZATIONAL
Sign in with credentials provided by your organization.

Organizational Username

Organizational Password

Show/Hide Password

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members:

Non-members: ADD TO CART

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years