In order to be able to accurately assess the Human Error Probability (HEP) of high-speed rail train dispatchers. a HEP quantitative evaluation model based on Improved Weighted Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis (CREAM) was constructed, which corrected the shortcomings of traditional CREMA. Using bipolar 2-tuples as the Common Performance Condition (CPC) evaluation linguistics, the subjective and objective weights of CPC are calculated through the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Criteria Importance Though Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC), and then the combined weighting method is used to further obtain the comprehensive weight of CPC ; At the same time, the idea of group decision making is used to reduce the subjectivity of CPC evaluation, and the weight of experts is calculated by using the adaptive dynamic weight adjustment method of grey correlation degree; on the basis of obtaining CPC and expert weights, the evaluation value of CPC is calculated. The weighted operation then obtains the Context Influence Index (CII) value; finally, the quantitative calculation of HEP is obtained by using the CII value. The model is validated by taking the high-speed train dispatcher's normal and abnormal train reception as examples. The research results show that: under normal conditions, the HEP of high-speed rail train dispatchers is 9.1586×10-5, and under abnormal conditions, the HEP of highspeed rail train dispatchers is 2.1189×10-3. Under abnormal circumstances, the human error probability of high-speed train dispatchers is more than 20 times that under normal circumstances. At the same time, compared with other methods, the model has certain advantages in terms of weight sensitivity, data utilization sufficiency, and model solution domain. The improved CREAM model can better reflect the impact of different CPCs on high-speed rail train dispatchers, and can provide a calculation method for the HEP quantification of high-speed rail train dispatchers.
In order to prevent and reduce the human error of high-speed railway train dispatchers, the method of TOmada de Decisão Interativa Multicritério (TODIM) and Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE-II) was used to identify the human error risk of train dispatchers. In this paper, the risk attribute set is constructed from the three dimensions of human error probability, human error severity, and human error detection degree. Considering the fuzziness and uncertainty of risk attributes, it is represented by 2-tuples. At the same time, the entropy weight method is used to calculate the attribute weight. In order to reduce the defects of using TODIM and PROMETHEEII methods alone, the two methods are integrated and a new risk identification model is constructed. And the model is applied to the risk identification of human errors in dispatching command operations. The results show that the model can effectively identify the human error risk of train dispatchers, and the top three human error modes are the inversion of the operating procedure, the wrong handling decision and the issuance of invalid orders.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.