PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
SPIE publishes accepted journal articles as soon as they are approved for publication. Journal issues are considered In Progress until all articles for an issue have been published. Articles published ahead of the completed issue are fully citable.
Accurate detection of microcalcifications (μCalcs) is crucial for the early detection of breast cancer. Some clinical studies have indicated that digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems with a wide angular range have inferior μCalc detectability compared with those with a narrow angular range. This study aims to (1) provide guidance for optimizing wide-angle (WA) DBT for improving μCalcs detectability and (2) prioritize key optimization factors.
Approach
An in-silico DBT pipeline was constructed to evaluate μCalc detectability of a WA DBT system under various imaging conditions: focal spot motion (FSM), angular dose distribution (ADS), detector pixel pitch, and detector electronic noise (EN). Images were simulated using a digital anthropomorphic breast phantom inserted with 120μmμCalc clusters. Evaluation metrics included the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the filtered channel observer and the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) of multiple-reader multiple-case analysis.
Results
Results showed that FSM degraded μCalcs sharpness and decreased the SNR and AUC by 5.2% and 1.8%, respectively. Non-uniform ADS increased the SNR by 62.8% and the AUC by 10.2% for filtered backprojection reconstruction with a typical clinical filter setting. When EN decreased from 2000 to 200 electrons, the SNR and AUC increased by 21.6% and 5.0%, respectively. Decreasing the detector pixel pitch from 85 to 50μm improved the SNR and AUC by 55.6% and 7.5%, respectively. The combined improvement of a 50μm pixel pitch and EN200 was 89.2% in the SNR and 12.8% in the AUC.
Conclusions
Based on the magnitude of impact, the priority for enhancing μCalc detectability in WA DBT is as follows: (1) utilizing detectors with a small pixel pitch and low EN level, (2) allocating a higher dose to central projections, and (3) reducing FSM. The results from this study can potentially provide guidance for DBT system optimization in the future.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
Use of mechanical imaging (MI) as complementary to digital mammography (DM), or in simultaneous digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and MI – DBTMI, has demonstrated the potential to increase the specificity of breast cancer screening and reduce unnecessary biopsies compared with DM. The aim of this study is to investigate the increase in the radiation dose due to the presence of an MI sensor during simultaneous image acquisition when automatic exposure control is used.
Approach
A radiation dose study was conducted on clinically available breast imaging systems with and without an MI sensor present. Our estimations were based on three approaches. In the first approach, exposure values were compared in paired clinical DBT and DBTMI acquisitions in 97 women. In the second approach polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantoms of various thicknesses were used, and the average glandular dose (AGD) values were compared. Finally, a rectangular PMMA phantom with a 45 mm thickness was used, and the AGD values were estimated based on air kerma measurements with an electronic dosemeter.
Results
The relative increase in exposure estimated from digital imaging and communications in medicine headers when using an MI sensor in clinical DBTMI was 11.9%±10.4. For the phantom measurements of various thicknesses of PMMA, the relative increases in the AGD for DM and DBT measurements were, on average, 10.7%±3.1 and 11.4%±3.0, respectively. The relative increase in the AGD using the electronic dosemeter was 11.2%±<0.001 in DM and 12.2%±<0.001 in DBT. The average difference in dose between the methods was 11.5%±3.3.
Conclusions
Our measurements suggest that the use of simultaneous breast radiography and MI increases the AGD by an average of 11.5%±3.3. The increase in dose is within the acceptable values for mammography screening recommended by European guidelines.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.