Devices based on 2D material channels require high-quality monolayer material. However, although the value of many laboratory metrology techniques has been demonstrated on small coupons, the development of inline characterization of 2D material layers grown on full 300mm wafers is still missing. In this work, we evaluate and combine different inline metrologies to characterize at wafer level the thickness and the morphology of tungsten disulfide (WS2) layers grown on full 300mm wafers. Combining the results from the different techniques allows us to reveal the morphology and the thickness of the WS2 layers as well as their uniformity across the 300 mm wafers for different growth conditions.
KEYWORDS: Etching, System on a chip, Image processing, Sensors, Lithography, Semiconducting wafers, Distance measurement, Process control, Transistors, Signal to noise ratio
BackgroundThe self-aligned double-patterning (SADP) process is being used extensively to overcome the lithographic resolution limit in the manufacture of integrated circuits. One use case is fin definition in a fin field-effect transistor. Fin cut layers are applied to modify the fins to the requirements of the device designs.AimThe traditional secondary electron (SE) imaging exhibits a disadvantage in the process controlling the fin cut layers, and fin damage defects were observed. This work aims to improve the monitoring and controlling capabilities for the process quality of fin cut layers.ApproachA specially designed fin cut process flow and a backscattered electron (BSE) imaging technique are applied to check the process quality. The patterns formed through the fin cut etch and the fin structures are identified and measured simultaneously in one BSE image.ResultsBy measuring the edge-to-edge distance, pitch walking (PW) of fins, and overlay (OV), the root cause of the fin damage is revealed. The linear fitting model and third-order fitting model are applied to reduce the edge placement error (EPE). The edge distance protecting the “at risk” fin is enlarged from 5.6 to 11.6 nm. The range of the distance is reduced from 11.6 to 8.1 nm, and the improvement in standard deviation is about 33%.ConclusionsThis work shows the capability of the BSE imaging technique in the characterization of fin cut layers and the potential in process window improvement restricted to fin damage defects.
This Conference Presentation, “A holistic study of edge placement error on fin cut layer in self-aligned double patterning process,” was recorded at SPIE Photonics West held in San Francisco, California, United States.
As technology progress with scaling to meet the market requirements, the patterning characterization of dense features suffers a significant challenge for current optic tools, and measurement accuracy will be an important index and great challenge as well. Patterning can mostly be characterized with index of overlay (OVL) and CDU (critical dimension uniformity) measurement. When you break down the budget of the overlay error, one of the challenges is a gap of measurement results between scribe and device, where provides improper information to be used in overlay correction and causes process anomaly (excursion) detection, resulting in a low yield at the end of the production process. An eBeam tool, using high electron landing energies while utilizing the ElluminatorTM technology[1] for improvement backscattered electrons (BSE) imaging efficiency, can be utilized to directly capture OVL performance of device unit in-die, including local and global level, due to BSE function of eBeam tool[2]. In this paper, we demonstrate overlay measurement of M0 to Poly line in device for advanced logic node (only OVL X measurement), obtaining Overlay gap between in-die and scribe line to capture the actual behavior of device unit in-die. Massive OVL data is measured using eBeam tool with fast speed and high resolution, and local OVL results have been analyzed in detail. We’ve quantified what is the impact of overlay correction by different measurement ways whether it depends on optical tool or eBeam tool and benefits yield improvement.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.